Fine-tuning NK/China

User avatar
47andrej
Lieutenant
Posts: 1283
Joined: Sun 12 Feb 2012 19:22
Contact:

Re: Fine-tuning NK/China

Postby 47andrej » Thu 16 Feb 2017 23:41

540.jpg
540.jpg (93.83 KiB) Viewed 629 times


Tankforce is fine comrade, all we need is glorious infantry rebalance :!:

User avatar
keldon
Major
Posts: 1887
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2014 16:38
Location: Liebe Grüße aus Stuttgart
Contact:

Re: Fine-tuning NK/China

Postby keldon » Fri 17 Feb 2017 17:46

47andrej wrote:Tankforce is fine comrade, all we need is glorious infantry rebalance :!:


Rumor says no more patch, if this is true then this thread is now at the end of it's life.

A pity, since RD would be left in this sorry state, ultimately the "we are going to buff RD" fell short.

To be fair buffs were handed out, however they were in such low quantity and to some weired areas that in the end doesn't matter (strela/igla memes and new medium tanks in a heavy tank meta). I have said for more than a year that a dedicated patch can fix the problem of a major coalition, and a dedicated patch is kinda required since the coalition is... far less well designed than almost all of it's peers.

But oh well, whatever. Have some Son'Gun crossing river instead. http://www.fyjs.cn/thread-1855432-1-1.html
Image
亲们!大国梦哦! viewtopic.php?p=964119#p964119 小钱钱,真心甜,鼓钱包,放腰间,大国梦,早日圆

User avatar
keldon
Major
Posts: 1887
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2014 16:38
Location: Liebe Grüße aus Stuttgart
Contact:

Re: Fine-tuning NK/China

Postby keldon » Mon 20 Feb 2017 23:36

frostypooky wrote:ping


Hey, was somehow thinking about the longrange AA situation of NK. Do you know what else beside the S-125 on a reloading truck was/is in use? Tracked TEL are prefered, since mech/armor AA are kinda screwed.
Image
亲们!大国梦哦! viewtopic.php?p=964119#p964119 小钱钱,真心甜,鼓钱包,放腰间,大国梦,早日圆

User avatar
frostypooky
Lieutenant General
Posts: 4246
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 14:12
Contact:

Re: Fine-tuning NK/China

Postby frostypooky » Tue 21 Feb 2017 00:07

S-300 knockoff could be justified 8-)

but other than that, there is S-75 on TEL which is not meant to be used against tactical aircraft.

NK just doesn't have that much SPAA period, tracked or wheeled, guns or missiles. TELs and SPAAGs account for like 1% of their AA inventory. You can take about as many Strela-10s and M-1992s in one deck as they have in real life.

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2733
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: Fine-tuning NK/China

Postby HrcAk47 » Tue 21 Feb 2017 00:09

frostypooky wrote:S-300 knockoff could be justified 8-)

but other than that, there is S-75 on TEL which is not meant to be used against tactical aircraft.

NK just doesn't have that much SPAA period, tracked or wheeled, guns or missiles. TELs and SPAAGs account for like 1% of their AA inventory. You can take about as many Strela-10s and M-1992s in one deck as they have in real life.


S-75 on TEL would be surprisingly good, I think it stops emitting radar once it is out of ammo (like, immediately).
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

User avatar
frostypooky
Lieutenant General
Posts: 4246
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 14:12
Contact:

Re: Fine-tuning NK/China

Postby frostypooky » Tue 21 Feb 2017 00:18

They never had Shilkas though. It should be "rerolled" into pretty much the same chassis with ZPTU-4 and the M-1992's radar. (M-1983, Oryx had a NGA doc for it as a public source)

User avatar
Bougnas
Major-General
Posts: 3642
Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2014 18:24
Contact:

Re: Fine-tuning NK/China

Postby Bougnas » Tue 21 Feb 2017 11:09

frostypooky wrote:They never had Shilkas though. It should be "rerolled" into pretty much the same chassis with ZPTU-4 and the M-1992's radar. (M-1983, Oryx had a NGA doc for it as a public source)


Cult of the KPVT approved!
Image

User avatar
CandyMan
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2017
Joined: Sat 11 May 2013 01:24
Contact:

Re: Fine-tuning NK/China

Postby CandyMan » Tue 21 Feb 2017 14:29

frostypooky wrote:They never had Shilkas though. It should be "rerolled" into pretty much the same chassis with ZPTU-4 and the M-1992's radar. (M-1983, Oryx had a NGA doc for it as a public source)


Image
Image
Your standard pinko Commie swine...
Rabidnid wrote:NK has a veritable cornucopia of mediocrity to choose from when it comes to inexpensive vehicular recon!

User avatar
keldon
Major
Posts: 1887
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2014 16:38
Location: Liebe Grüße aus Stuttgart
Contact:

Re: Fine-tuning NK/China

Postby keldon » Tue 21 Feb 2017 16:25

frostypooky wrote:S-300 knockoff could be justified 8-)

but other than that, there is S-75 on TEL which is not meant to be used against tactical aircraft.

NK just doesn't have that much SPAA period, tracked or wheeled, guns or missiles. TELs and SPAAGs account for like 1% of their AA inventory. You can take about as many Strela-10s and M-1992s in one deck as they have in real life.


Any pics of that TEL? Maybe it's the same as the PLA HQ-2. It does look like China has to carry in the long range AA department. :/ Eugen really should have extended the "shared inventory" a bit more than just RPG.


btw. something different. Janes done a showcase of sorts for the VT-4. The ATGM showed include what looks like a bastion and the Reflex

Image
亲们!大国梦哦! viewtopic.php?p=964119#p964119 小钱钱,真心甜,鼓钱包,放腰间,大国梦,早日圆

User avatar
QUAD
Colonel
Posts: 2750
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013 21:17
Contact:

Re: Fine-tuning NK/China

Postby QUAD » Tue 21 Feb 2017 23:15

Relic handed over balance to competitive community and hardcore invested modders (one would be Iris or hansbroger or codextro) and allows them to tweak game with approval of one employee. Not sure why Eugen can't do the same.
BUFF USA

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests