Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

User avatar
Mike
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 12048
Joined: Thu 20 Feb 2014 01:09
Location: Virginia, United States of America
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby Mike » Fri 27 Jan 2017 07:27

GARGEAN wrote:
Zaskow wrote:Ahem...
Image

Muh faster! Balanced! Also better range!


The one on the left is the price you have to play for having MG3 infantry.
Image
Courtesy of KattiValk

XanderTuron
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 503
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2016 23:17
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby XanderTuron » Fri 27 Jan 2017 08:53

Mike wrote:The one on the left is the price you have to play for having MG3 infantry.

Everyone knows that the holy buzzsaw comes with an automatic 5 point tax.
My mouth is moving, but nothing relevant is coming out. Also I cannot guarantee that my research is perfect or even remotely accurate.

I have low quality Wargame Red Dragon casts on my youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/XanderTuron

User avatar
Bougnas
Major-General
Posts: 3628
Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2014 18:24
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby Bougnas » Fri 27 Jan 2017 19:35

No, the I-TOW and TOW MD 500 (and actually most low end ATGM helos) are really overpriced.

For example the SK I-TOW Defender costs 50pts althought the Finnish TOW 2 one costs the same (and it's balanced with other similar AT helos). The TOW one costs as much as the Gazelle HOT (wat).

Even the Lahatut MAPATS is a bit overpriced as it costs 10pts more than a TOW 2 Defender while having 3 less AP and less accuracy. The higher range arguably doesn't justify such a huge tax.

IMO, the TOW MD 500 should have it's price reduced to 30, I-TOW to 40pt, and Lahatut MAPATS to 50pts (the higher range makes up for the lower firepower) (with avail set accordingly).

The 35pt Alouette and Huey SS-11 could easily go to 25pts considering their slow speed and very low accuracy, and polish Mi-2 gunships could get a price buff as well (along with 210kph speed. The URN Zmija could go to recon as it was it's intended role).
Image

User avatar
Mike
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 12048
Joined: Thu 20 Feb 2014 01:09
Location: Virginia, United States of America
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby Mike » Fri 27 Jan 2017 20:41

XanderTuron wrote:
Mike wrote:The one on the left is the price you have to play for having MG3 infantry.

Everyone knows that the holy buzzsaw comes with an automatic 5 point tax.


Yes, but now you have to pay that tanks on many other units that that nation has because of the advantages the MG3 offered.
Image
Courtesy of KattiValk

User avatar
kvasius
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 300
Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2015 22:38
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby kvasius » Sat 28 Jan 2017 00:01

Dont know if intended or not, but DDR CAS Su-22M4 has 10 percent ECM, while all other Su-22M4's have at least 20. Even the older ones.
Spoiler : :
Image
Image

User avatar
another505
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 12907
Joined: Sun 21 Jul 2013 05:18
Location: Hiatus
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby another505 » Sun 29 Jan 2017 09:37

Also, just noticed,

why does some redfor 7.62 MG has 40 suppression, the same as 5.56? . The RPK in EB and RD, the LADA

meanwhile , others like MG3, 6.5mm ksp m/58 (panskar 90) and M53 and so on has 55 suppression like standardized.
Image
Of Salt

XanderTuron
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 503
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2016 23:17
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby XanderTuron » Sun 29 Jan 2017 09:50

another505 wrote:Also, just noticed,

why does some redfor 7.62 MG has 40 suppression, the same as 5.56? . The RPK in EB and RD, the LADA

meanwhile , others like MG3, 6.5mm ksp m/58 (panskar 90) and M53 and so on has 55 suppression like standardized.

The MGs you mentioned fire 7.62x39mm (an intermediate cartridge along with 5.56 and 5.45) while 55 suppression is mostly reserved for "full sized" cartridges (7.62x51mm and 7.62x54mm). If I recall correctly, it has been mentioned that there was an intention to change the armoury to display full cartridge dimensions, not just width.
My mouth is moving, but nothing relevant is coming out. Also I cannot guarantee that my research is perfect or even remotely accurate.

I have low quality Wargame Red Dragon casts on my youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/XanderTuron

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby HrcAk47 » Sun 29 Jan 2017 11:12

another505 wrote:Also, just noticed,

why does some redfor 7.62 MG has 40 suppression, the same as 5.56? . The RPK in EB and RD, the LADA

meanwhile , others like MG3, 6.5mm ksp m/58 (panskar 90) and M53 and so on has 55 suppression like standardized.


M-53 Šarac fires 7.92x57 ammo.
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby HrcAk47 » Wed 1 Feb 2017 14:32

Yugoslav militia (TO) costs 10 points, while the Chinese and North Korean militia (with identical weapon stats) costs 5 points.
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

RedFive
Warrant Officer
Posts: 400
Joined: Wed 6 Jan 2016 15:22
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby RedFive » Wed 1 Feb 2017 15:23

HrcAk47 wrote:Yugoslav militia (TO) costs 10 points, while the Chinese and North Korean militia (with identical weapon stats) costs 5 points.

Stats are not identical, though. Chinese militia don't have a submachinegun, and the Yugo reservists carry two more AT rockets that have higher suppression than the Chinese and North Korea versions.

One could certainly argue that those differences are not worth 5 points, though.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GARGEAN, Google [Bot], KattiValk and 29 guests