Error on some ships in WG:RD

User avatar
Vulcan 607
Brigadier
Posts: 3412
Joined: Mon 31 Mar 2014 20:40
Location: Malton
Contact:

Re: Error on some ships in WG:RD

Postby Vulcan 607 » Thu 23 Feb 2017 20:28

FrangibleCover wrote:
Vulcan 607 wrote:
McNash wrote:I think the game would have been ok just with coastal, supply and transport ships, escorts and capital ships are, in my opinion, what ruined naval gameplay.

The Ironic part is that the Iowa's are in scale for this sort of game while the sovs and udaloys are not! :lol:

They're in scale but they're not really balanced against anything. An Iowa is just going to take a gigantic dump on anything that Redfor can field in the littoral environment and then it's going to die like a bitch to aircraft carrying missiles. Mind you, Sverdlovs vs. Assorted South American Cruisers could be a laugh and a little more symmetrical. They're still going to get murdered by aircraft though.


Imagine it though 4 cards of Iowa's :lol: one for each of them!

Though they would probably then get sunk by some cheap amphibious ATGM vehicle still pissed off that I lost 3 type 21s that way on a skirmish

User avatar
Kung Fu Treachery
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 300
Joined: Sun 15 Sep 2013 17:20
Contact:

Re: Error on some ships in WG:RD

Postby Kung Fu Treachery » Thu 23 Feb 2017 22:40

Naval could be salvageable if you just delete everything bigger than the ROKN corvettes and the riverine gunboats.

Those actually could have added something to gameplay.

User avatar
axnone
First Sergeant
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri 12 Aug 2016 19:39
Location: Caerdydd
Contact:

Re: Error on some ships in WG:RD

Postby axnone » Fri 24 Feb 2017 13:41

FrangibleCover wrote:They're in scale but they're not really balanced against anything. An Iowa is just going to take a gigantic dump on anything that Redfor can field in the littoral environment and then it's going to die like a bitch to aircraft carrying missiles. Mind you, Sverdlovs vs. Assorted South American Cruisers could be a laugh and a little more symmetrical. They're still going to get murdered by aircraft though.

Luda managed to swat ASMs with garbage dual 37mm AA guns for years, I don`t see why Iowa can`t do the same :lol:

all four of the Iowa-class battleships were equipped with 20 quad 40 mm mounts and 49 single 20 mm mounts.

Quantity over quality! :mrgreen:
Image
二营长你他娘的PLZ-45呢,给我拉来!
Spoiler : :
A better Zhanshi`85(`90) for China!
RPG and\or price buff,Type 81 optional.
Dream come true?
:arrow: http://forums.eugensystems.com/viewtopic.php?f=187&t=59331#p1019327

User avatar
Mike
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 11379
Joined: Thu 20 Feb 2014 01:09
Location: Virginia, United States of America
Contact:

Re: Error on some ships in WG:RD

Postby Mike » Sat 25 Feb 2017 22:06

axnone wrote:
all four of the Iowa-class battleships were equipped with 20 quad 40 mm mounts and 49 single 20 mm mounts.

Quantity over quality! :mrgreen:


Those were removed during the modernizations. CIWS and Stingers are there for that now. And the 5" guns.
Image
Delta Force or Delta Farce?

User avatar
chykka
Brigadier
Posts: 3239
Joined: Wed 28 Nov 2012 14:55
Location: Canada, Alberta
Contact:

Re: Error on some ships in WG:RD

Postby chykka » Tue 28 Feb 2017 12:29

If you added subs the Udaloy would have something to do
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FrangibleCover, Razzmann, Steamfunk and 15 guests