Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Snez0k
Specialist
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat 28 May 2016 13:03
Contact:

Re: Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Postby Snez0k » Tue 7 Mar 2017 17:13

Would love to know how you know how many times I've faced this tactic, or how you know the skill levels of the players I've faced. Tactical games are what we're talking about, yeah? So 250-350 starting points? 2x MiGs are 220 points right? So he has 30-130 points of ground troops. Against your potential 250-350 points. If you can't win with that sort of advantage, the problem isn't the MiGs. If you're talking about other situations, tell me the details of them and I'll advise on them. And really, you feel sorry for me? Isn't that cute..... Why though? Because I can beat this "OP" tactic? Sounds like I should be feeling sorry for you if you can't think your way around this "problem".


Nobody need your's "advise". I play on patriots and it's easy counter them. I just want that developers rebalance them, i didn't asking your opinion or smth else at all... didn't know why you still give your "advise" in this topic.

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Postby HrcAk47 » Tue 7 Mar 2017 17:23

chykka wrote:My biggest complaints of the DLC, Dutch German get 2 or more 2a5s and more than 4 2a4 while Red Dragons gets 2 T90s max. Sure they can kill tanks with atgm, or plane but the avail difference makes RD very weak for tanks in comparison. Also Entente has no large supply trucks, I guess helos work but I find they come in more use in team games where two cards of small trucks is redundant.


ummm, Entente gets large (2400 L) cargo trucks from both Czechs and Yugos. They are rather spoilt for choice in that regard.
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

User avatar
KattiValk
General
Posts: 6197
Joined: Tue 19 Nov 2013 03:39
Location: Houston, Texas (CST)
Contact:

Re: Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Postby KattiValk » Tue 7 Mar 2017 18:08

edthebeast wrote:And really, you feel sorry for me? Isn't that cute..... Why though? Because I can beat this "OP" tactic? Sounds like I should be feeling sorry for you if you can't think your way around this "problem".
Snez0k wrote:I just want that developers rebalance them, i didn't asking your opinion or smth else at all... didn't know why you still give your "advise" in this topic.
Try to keep it civil, you two.

edthebeast
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue 31 Dec 2013 21:40
Contact:

Re: Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Postby edthebeast » Tue 7 Mar 2017 18:13

KattiValk wrote:
edthebeast wrote:And really, you feel sorry for me? Isn't that cute..... Why though? Because I can beat this "OP" tactic? Sounds like I should be feeling sorry for you if you can't think your way around this "problem".
Snez0k wrote:I just want that developers rebalance them, i didn't asking your opinion or smth else at all... didn't know why you still give your "advise" in this topic.
Try to keep it civil, you two.

*sees green name* sorry, shouldn't have risen to it.... I just wanted to offer some advice, and show how the tactic isn't unbeatable, but I'm just stonewalled with hostility.... I just got frustrated, you know? Sorry anyway. Consider me moderated.
The only (probably) sane player to take a card of Akulas voluntarily..... UNTIL RED DRAGON!

Image

Snez0k
Specialist
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat 28 May 2016 13:03
Contact:

Re: Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Postby Snez0k » Tue 7 Mar 2017 18:33

KattiValk wrote:
edthebeast wrote:And really, you feel sorry for me? Isn't that cute..... Why though? Because I can beat this "OP" tactic? Sounds like I should be feeling sorry for you if you can't think your way around this "problem".
Snez0k wrote:I just want that developers rebalance them, i didn't asking your opinion or smth else at all... didn't know why you still give your "advise" in this topic.
Try to keep it civil, you two.


Eh... sorry, i really too angry today

Snez0k
Specialist
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat 28 May 2016 13:03
Contact:

Re: Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Postby Snez0k » Tue 7 Mar 2017 18:35

edthebeast wrote:
KattiValk wrote:
edthebeast wrote:And really, you feel sorry for me? Isn't that cute..... Why though? Because I can beat this "OP" tactic? Sounds like I should be feeling sorry for you if you can't think your way around this "problem".
Snez0k wrote:I just want that developers rebalance them, i didn't asking your opinion or smth else at all... didn't know why you still give your "advise" in this topic.
Try to keep it civil, you two.

*sees green name* sorry, shouldn't have risen to it.... I just wanted to offer some advice, and show how the tactic isn't unbeatable, but I'm just stonewalled with hostility.... I just got frustrated, you know? Sorry anyway. Consider me moderated.


Sorry me too, just bad day today, didn't want to abuse anybody, it wrong place for that (

Guggy
General
Posts: 8615
Joined: Thu 17 Nov 2011 02:53
Location: peaceful skeleton realm
Contact:

Re: Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Postby Guggy » Tue 7 Mar 2017 19:52

None of you are forgiven, and shall be damned to the appropriate layer of hell at the first opportunity.

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7246
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Postby Razzmann » Tue 7 Mar 2017 20:16

KattiValk wrote:
edthebeast wrote:And really, you feel sorry for me? Isn't that cute..... Why though? Because I can beat this "OP" tactic? Sounds like I should be feeling sorry for you if you can't think your way around this "problem".
Snez0k wrote:I just want that developers rebalance them, i didn't asking your opinion or smth else at all... didn't know why you still give your "advise" in this topic.
Try to keep it civil, you two.

No green font. No bold font.
2/10.

User avatar
wargamer1985
Brigadier
Posts: 3298
Joined: Sat 4 May 2013 00:36
Contact:

Re: Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Postby wargamer1985 » Tue 7 Mar 2017 20:40

Razzmann wrote:
KattiValk wrote:Try to keep it civil, you two.

No green font. No bold font.
2/10.

I gotchu

(I promise I won't spell like that ever again)
APPLY TO THE GLORIOUS CULT OF THE WARHAWK! LIBERATING NAZIS SINCE 1939!
Image

edthebeast
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue 31 Dec 2013 21:40
Contact:

Re: Mig-29 9.13 "Tactical" Tactic

Postby edthebeast » Tue 7 Mar 2017 21:01

Guggy wrote:None of you are forgiven, and shall be damned to the appropriate layer of hell at the first opportunity.

Sorry, forgot the 11th commandment was "thou shalt not claim DLC nations are balanced".
The only (probably) sane player to take a card of Akulas voluntarily..... UNTIL RED DRAGON!

Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests