Whether to alter Suppression and HE values for MGs?

User avatar
damoj
Sergeant Major
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon 26 Sep 2016 10:07
Contact:

Whether to alter Suppression and HE values for MGs?

Postby damoj » Sat 1 Jul 2017 16:37

There is a massive gap between the lethality and utility of 7.62mm and .50cal, and virtually none between 7.62mm and 5.56mm.

Should the values of MGs - and other small arms, for that matter - be given another go-over?


I think 7.62mm-tier weapons deserve a 0.6 HE value or thereabouts.

I think the suppressive power of 12.7mm/.50cal weapons should be slightly reduced, maybe to 85.

I think the KPVT (14.5mm) should have the characteristics (and price-logic) of 12.7mm-tier MGs, and have a reduced or absent AP value (0.5 or nil).

User avatar
Mike
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 12103
Joined: Thu 20 Feb 2014 01:09
Location: Virginia, United States of America
Contact:

Re: Whether to alter Suppression and HE values for MGs?

Postby Mike » Sun 2 Jul 2017 01:46

Buff MG3?
Image
Courtesy of KattiValk

thelizardofdoom
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat 2 Apr 2016 10:15
Contact:

Re: Whether to alter Suppression and HE values for MGs?

Postby thelizardofdoom » Fri 14 Jul 2017 15:26

If anything the battle bus MGs need buffed. target I'm in the camp of people who think that small difference in calibre doesn't matter to the target. But it is hilarious that some Guy running around with a LMG has more acc and range than a vehicle mounted one.
Yes im aware my grammar and spelling are dreadful. Email complaints to android for having terrible software or eugen for having a mobile unfriendly site.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests