No C-300 ?

ilias
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon 11 Jul 2016 04:07
Contact:

Re: No C-300 ?

Postby ilias » Wed 6 Sep 2017 13:30

steppewolf wrote:7 pages arguing about a missile which is not in a game that nearly hit abandonware category :shock:

Its discussion, not arguing, and its a question theme, not implementation request, while still any abandoned game always can get improvement at any time (Act of War was updated for new windows OS s and relaunched, its 2006y's)


ilias
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon 11 Jul 2016 04:07
Contact:

Re: No C-300 ?

Postby ilias » Wed 6 Sep 2017 14:01

steppewolf wrote:I like your optimism

try it out )

User avatar
molnibalage
General
Posts: 6545
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 22:54
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: No C-300 ?

Postby molnibalage » Wed 6 Sep 2017 22:01

ilias wrote:
molnibalage wrote:..

Thank you for good straight description,
so there was at least 1 s-300v brigade which could present in active army ?
(please cut amount of abbreviations)

Yes, it was.

ilias
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon 11 Jul 2016 04:07
Contact:

Re: No C-300 ?

Postby ilias » Thu 7 Sep 2017 03:35

molnibalage wrote:
ilias wrote:
molnibalage wrote:..

Thank you for good straight description,
so there was at least 1 s-300v brigade which could present in active army ?
(please cut amount of abbreviations)

Yes, it was.

Sooo.., S-300V then, 1 thing max(or 2 maybe), to "URSS"

User avatar
molnibalage
General
Posts: 6545
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 22:54
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: No C-300 ?

Postby molnibalage » Thu 7 Sep 2017 09:52

ilias wrote:Yes, it was.

Sooo.., S-300V then, 1 thing max(or 2 maybe), to "URSS"[/quote]
As proto yes. It would be a prolbem it would make USSR even more OP as today...

GARGEAN
Brigadier
Posts: 3496
Joined: Wed 9 Apr 2014 14:19
Contact:

Re: No C-300 ?

Postby GARGEAN » Thu 7 Sep 2017 17:02

molnibalage wrote:As proto yes. It would be a prolbem it would make USSR even more OP as today...

Yeah, cause USSR is sooooo OP today... Lol.

User avatar
molnibalage
General
Posts: 6545
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 22:54
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: No C-300 ?

Postby molnibalage » Thu 7 Sep 2017 20:17

GARGEAN wrote:
molnibalage wrote:As proto yes. It would be a prolbem it would make USSR even more OP as today...

Yeah, cause USSR is sooooo OP today... Lol.

Comparng to USA is all around while its air force is laughably over modeled...
In ALB the relation between US and USSR was far better in absraction...

GARGEAN
Brigadier
Posts: 3496
Joined: Wed 9 Apr 2014 14:19
Contact:

Re: No C-300 ?

Postby GARGEAN » Thu 7 Sep 2017 23:06

molnibalage wrote:Comparng to USA is all around while its air force is laughably over modeled...
In ALB the relation between US and USSR was far better in absraction...

Yeap, so overmodelled! R-37 that are so drastically superior to AIM-54, even more that in reality! So much KABs that started serial only in 1976, so drastically out of timeframe! So much 1500kg bombs that was never really used and was only a paper dragons!

Guggy
General
Posts: 8621
Joined: Thu 17 Nov 2011 02:53
Location: peaceful skeleton realm
Contact:

Re: No C-300 ?

Postby Guggy » Fri 8 Sep 2017 00:44

C-300!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fade2Gray and 33 guests