the option to remove non specialised decks from your games already exists. there's no reason to remove the option from the game entirely, unless the specialisations were researched thoroughly and comprehensively aligned with national TsOE I was always pro realistic TOEs. But I've lost the hope they...

The option to create a non-specialized deck should be removed.

1) Setting 1986, German-German border. EE nations. No prototypes, no OOTF units, no units that were extremely rare. 2) You have to choose a battalion from a specific nation (US Infantry Battalion, Soviet BTR-Battalion, etc.) and use exactly the units that such a battalion had, plus some extra attach...

Small vehicles such as jeeps (regardless which weapon they carry) and Wiesel could get "good" stealth...

The high aim time of artillery is something good. Just increase suppression, this will greatly imporve medium artillery.

Eastern Block Moto is already the best Moto deck. And I am strictly against Paratroopers in Mech and Moto. Czech Moto is also rather good, you get the most Konkurs-M, you get better inf than Soviets, you get the AGS-17. And these very cheap reservists. Motostrelci are good because they have fast 10p...

Motorized and Mechanized represent normal, regular infantry regiments or brigades. Please no Paras or Marines in these decks. Replacing line with shock inf in every deck is BS, buff line instead.

Germany had 1 MG 3 afaik

Soviets and Americans had 2 MGs per squad (not sure about BTR squads).

Taking an armored deck means you sacrifice your hold on towns/forests in exchange for the ability to overrun open sectors using an overwhelming force of highly trained tanks. That's the entire point of a specialization. It would be stupid to give an armored deck the option to take out entire towns ...