Search found 51 matches

Go to advanced search

by M3SS3NG3R
Tue 17 Sep 2013 16:28
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Taiwan?
Replies: 67
Views: 6841

Re: Taiwan?

The game will most likely be banned regardless lol.
by M3SS3NG3R
Tue 17 Sep 2013 15:59
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Taiwan?
Replies: 67
Views: 6841

Re: Taiwan?

It would be amazing to see Taiwan and Vietnam based on just how much of a military presence/influence they represented in the region at the time. Too bad there's probably too much politics for that to happen.
by M3SS3NG3R
Fri 13 Sep 2013 21:24
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: why don't YOU play conquest.
Replies: 239
Views: 15092

Re: why don't YOU play conquest.

Nothing's stopping me at the moment, but one can assume that if it replaces destruction in ranked one will not get to choose a high point and time limit. Well maybe then that's what we should focus our discussion on (ie: what kind of point & time limit setting is best suited for ranked conquest...
by M3SS3NG3R
Fri 13 Sep 2013 19:03
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: why don't YOU play conquest.
Replies: 239
Views: 15092

Re: why don't YOU play conquest.

An army that's holding an arbitrarily lower portion of the areas in a region would not, however, give up and leave once the opposing force had held their majority for X number of minutes. What's stopping you from setting a high point & time limit? My last conquest game ended when one side gave ...
by M3SS3NG3R
Thu 12 Sep 2013 15:49
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Strategy question: When playing Destruction, why attack?
Replies: 50
Views: 3463

Re: Strategy question: When playing Destruction, why attack?

If you put your cv into an obvious forest it's your own fault. I'm a Colonel so I know the cheesy tricks. Just have good ground/plane-AA and don't let them spy on you. Known AA/CV should be relocated. Do you really know what I'm talking about? I'm talking about the cheese where the losing guy puts ...
by M3SS3NG3R
Tue 10 Sep 2013 18:00
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Strategy question: When playing Destruction, why attack?
Replies: 50
Views: 3463

Re: Strategy question: When playing Destruction, why attack?

If you get asskicked with cheesy tricks you are not as experienced as you claim to be. And to the other ones: You are early quitters, thx for making my point. You saying it takes experience to cut down the time finding your opponent's CV in the forest on Battle for Fjord? :lol: If you haven't exper...
by M3SS3NG3R
Tue 10 Sep 2013 15:26
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Strategy question: When playing Destruction, why attack?
Replies: 50
Views: 3463

Re: Strategy question: When playing Destruction, why attack?

Until they manage to put in the much needed anti ninja CV mechanics and somehow fix right click to win helicopter spam on small maps, total destruction with no time limit will stay as a joke competitively. I've been a proponent of total destruction w/o time limit before conquest was released. I've a...
by M3SS3NG3R
Tue 10 Sep 2013 06:44
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Strategy question: When playing Destruction, why attack?
Replies: 50
Views: 3463

Re: Strategy question: When playing Destruction, why attack?

Not to mention the hilarity that ensues when people hide their CVs in forests.

Yeah, the ultimate camp -> literally take your CV to camping. Solution: screw the stupidity that is destruction. Play conquest.
by M3SS3NG3R
Fri 6 Sep 2013 00:37
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: why don't YOU play conquest.
Replies: 239
Views: 15092

Re: why don't YOU play conquest.

The problem for me is that the most contested zones are spawn points. So once a team grabs a zone, they get a double advantage: they get the zone points plus they can spawn units directly into the zone to defend it. Meanwhile the losing team has to trundle units across the map to try to take a zone...
by M3SS3NG3R
Thu 29 Aug 2013 05:05
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: helicopter-killer aircraft for Pact and NATO
Replies: 62
Views: 5367

Re: helicopter-killer aircraft for Pact and NATO

Ah I get it now. That is intriguing. So the ROF stat has no bearing to the DPS of the weapon systems in game (at least when it comes to aircraft mounted cannons)? Wow.

Go to advanced search