Search found 165 matches

Go to advanced search

by Mopsidae
Sun 5 Jan 2014 18:51
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Base T80/B: What is good about this tank?
Replies: 106
Views: 6220

Re: Base T80/B: What is good about this tank?

Bring the old availability back for the baseline 80. It used to be a nice little gun tank, well worth taking in pretty much any USSR deck for those early game pushes. Now it's too expensive and too few in number to justify taking a slot away from a 64BV or or a 72BI.
by Mopsidae
Fri 3 Jan 2014 14:55
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Marder 1: Which one?
Replies: 19
Views: 1745

Re: Marder 1: Which one?

The A3 is an absolute monster when employed effectively. Useful against land forces at all ranges, and can take a beating with 4 frontal armour. But as with all quality IFVs it's somewhat expensive and difficult to use effectively; in most situations you'd be better off with Jagdkommando squads and ...
by Mopsidae
Wed 1 Jan 2014 13:36
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Gjoll terrain deformation
Replies: 12
Views: 1121

Re: Gjoll terrain deformation

There's still an entire road on Ragnarok that doesn't actually function as a road. Been the same way since it came out, has yet to be fixed. Props for highlighting this but don't get your hopes up.
by Mopsidae
Mon 30 Dec 2013 01:05
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Things you DO NOT want to see in WG:RD
Replies: 532
Views: 26335

Re: Things you DO NOT want to see in WG:RD

British Territorials. there's no such thing as a British territorial being deployed as they are in RD. British reserve forces are basically "mobilized" and trained to the same level as a regular battalion and attached to there regular regiment. EG Parachute regiment has 10 battalions on p...
by Mopsidae
Mon 9 Dec 2013 18:37
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: [RD] Unit of the Day
Replies: 4567
Views: 424700

Re: Unit of the Day (RD version)

Hey bro, I am Military fan from Korea. I am very upset about describing Hellcat TD as ROK army AFV. There was not any chance for using Hellcat TD to ROK Army. At Korean War ROK army used M36 TD "Jackson" as light tank, and after the war used M4 Sherman. M36 Jacksons were retired at ROK ar...
by Mopsidae
Mon 9 Dec 2013 17:18
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: [RD] Unit of the Day
Replies: 4567
Views: 424700

Re: Unit of the Day (RD version)

For what it's worth, in all my years of being incredibly autistic about military history i've never heard of the ROK using M18 Hellcats, even as M39s, which were de-turreted APC/ammo carrying variants. Only nations i've heard of using it were the US, West Germany, Serbia, Venezuela and the ROC. They...
by Mopsidae
Mon 9 Dec 2013 14:28
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: [RD] Unit of the Day
Replies: 4567
Views: 424700

Re: Unit of the Day (RD version)

[EUG]MadMat wrote:I'm old enough to be your grandpa, but I'm still faster than you'll ever be ...
Image
http://i.imgur.com/Al91lTA.png


HELLCAT

WOO WOO WOO

TANK WITH 90KMPH OFF-ROAD SPEED IS GO!
by Mopsidae
Mon 9 Dec 2013 11:16
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: [RD] Unit of the Day
Replies: 4567
Views: 424700

Re: Unit of the Day (RD version)

Tyrfinn wrote:The little sentence sounds like North-Korea... maybe the Ch'ŏnma-ho III?

€: Nope that doesn't fit.


Check the OP. Chonma-ho IV has already been revealed, it'd be dumb to showcase two visually identical units.
by Mopsidae
Mon 9 Dec 2013 11:13
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: [RD] Unit of the Day
Replies: 4567
Views: 424700

Re: Unit of the Day (RD version)

chema1994 wrote:Looks like a M113 with a big gun, or another boxy design


Yeah, my first thought was Sherman when I saw the boxy, small hull.
by Mopsidae
Thu 5 Dec 2013 12:00
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Mbt 70 why?
Replies: 53
Views: 4059

Re: Mbt 70 why?

So while comparing Mbt 70 US vs Ger and seing the German one being better most times you would think the US one would have more per card than the Ger one but currently it dosent. Is that to prevent spam or are is there something hidden im not seing :? . They're both available pre-1975. Can't have t...

Go to advanced search