when i saw steam update quickly, i reminisced of the times i would fawn over small data changes that affected wargame greatly. i clicked on steam, and saw to my surprise it was actually a red dragon patch. i then rushed to the forum, like in days of old to see the new change list. now i am here. fin...

chykka wrote:

you ever play ruse, 10 players, 1v1v1v1v......

start at nuke age. played this a bunch towards the end of ruse's lifespan. great fun, still fun with ai.

had this sig since alb.

figured i would put it here.

i've also had issues shooting infantry in buildings since the last patch. HE weapons, machine guns included, can damage infantry in buildings using fire on position, but refuse to fire on them otherwise.

at the moment, i don't believe total destruction is working as intended, on the pointe du hoc map. http://i.imgur.com/PFqC8pG.jpg

what about a less linear multiplayer match?

e.g. one side starts with 3/4 of the map for deployment, and in b phase, but gets half income.

the other side starts normally.

did you just call me shabby?

yeah, armoured is more of a way to keep your tanks in good morale. veteran and elite tanks never seem to go past worried, unless in a cluster barrage or direct high HE artillery. it doesnt matter so much in tank on tank engagements at range, but when your meat shield transports get blown up, with ro...

i only play total destruction no time limit games, best game mode in my opinion, you just have to structure a deck for longevity.

3 independent mgs having more effect than 1 minigun in combat does not surprise me from a realism standpoint. Emphasis on independent though. Ability to cover several sectors and engage several targets with automatic fire independently can do wonders in a firefight. Agree that zelda should probably...