Search found 1994 matches
- Fri 1 Aug 2014 13:33
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: New version (v557)
- Replies: 380
- Views: 42686
Re: New version (v557)
Pivads accuracy not reduced? - REDFOR ZU-23-2 accuracy reduced from 20% to 10%. - Polish Sopel accuracy reduced from 35% to 25% - Polish ZU-23-2S accuracy reduced from 20% to 10% - CSSR M53/59 Praga accuracy reduced from 30% to 15% - CSSR Strop 1 accuracy reduced from 40% to 25% - CSSR Strop 2 accur...
- Fri 1 Aug 2014 06:31
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Soviet Units in W:RD
- Replies: 1909
- Views: 135719
Re: Soviet Units in W:RD
But once that is taken care of, the T-62 is one of the top candidates for repricing or re-inspection I'd say. I dont think i've seen one in non-themed deck ever :( It was a key part of like ONE meta in early/mid W:EE, and then heard from like... once or twice since then. Especially non ATGM ones no...
- Fri 1 Aug 2014 06:16
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Soviet Units in W:RD
- Replies: 1909
- Views: 135719
Re: Soviet Units in W:RD
Guggy wrote:T-55 was a revolutionary tank. T-64 was a phenomenal tank. 72 was great. T-80 excellent.
T-62 in comparison, wasnt.
In comparison with T-64, 72 and 80? Maybe.
BTW don't you find that T-62 in current meta heavy overpriced?
- Fri 1 Aug 2014 06:08
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Soviet Units in W:RD
- Replies: 1909
- Views: 135719
Re: Soviet Units in W:RD
Guggy wrote:Sweedish_Gunner wrote: Eugen hates the T-62.![]()
So does reality!
Actually you quite often repeat about "crap T-62" on forum. Got proof?

- Thu 31 Jul 2014 09:17
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: I don't like Autoloader Tanks and SPAAG Buffs
- Replies: 143
- Views: 11731
Re: I don't like Autoloader Tanks and SPAAG Buffs
Someone don't like leopard mexas c2, shiki G, m1, and many other dirt cheap and very accurate HATO tanks?
- Wed 30 Jul 2014 14:58
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: BTR-60 vs VAB T20/13
- Replies: 63
- Views: 6578
Re: BTR-60 vs VAB T20/13
I have said it before and will say it again. Remove the AP, reduce cost by 5 and claim that it uses old outdated ammo. It might not be 'correct', but I doubt anyone would complain. It's not as if anyone brings the PA for it's AP anyway. No need to change model, no need to change name. Only requires...
- Wed 30 Jul 2014 14:41
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: BTR-60 vs VAB T20/13
- Replies: 63
- Views: 6578
Re: BTR-60 vs VAB T20/13
No, i have seen them do well at 800m ranges, but then again they should be around that as a infantry transport to get the infantry close enough to be effective in combat in my view and to provide support(or the couple times i have used them they seem to work well here). if you want close range http...
- Wed 30 Jul 2014 14:34
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: BTR-60 vs VAB T20/13
- Replies: 63
- Views: 6578
Re: BTR-60 vs VAB T20/13
KPVT hardly effective even againtst light vehicles http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nikb3GOxBUQ Max range isnt exactly where i would have them fire, lol, i have also watched fights just like that where the KPVT destroyed the LAV transports fairly fast. Next you say "close and medium range" ...
- Wed 30 Jul 2014 13:04
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: BTR-60 vs VAB T20/13
- Replies: 63
- Views: 6578
Re: BTR-60 vs VAB T20/13
KPVT hardly effective even againtst light vehicles
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nikb3GOxBUQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nikb3GOxBUQ
- Wed 30 Jul 2014 09:40
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: SU-25T need buff
- Replies: 281
- Views: 25618
Re: SU-25T need buff
NATO Potato wrote:what are the chances I will be doing Su25T SEAD/ATGM runs in the future?
With auto evac when SEAD missiles gone? We already have weird Su-25 with unguided and guided missiles mix.