Steel Division, AKA Wargame WW2, has completely removed fuel from vehicles.
And it's great. Nobody misses it. Fuel is a cancer and complete waste of time.
Can we please get it removed in Red Dragon, assuming there will ever be another patch?
Search found 577 matches
- Thu 6 Apr 2017 10:51
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Now that SD shows how awful fuel has been, can we remove fuel?
- Replies: 66
- Views: 8257
- Fri 3 Mar 2017 10:37
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Mod tools for Wargame Red Dragon, from Steel Division?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1895
Re: Mod tools for Wargame Red Dragon, from Steel Division?
No, never been a thing yet it keeps cropping up. Its all in house stuff. Long story short, wargame dev tools are a complicated mess and they don't want to release mod tools unless they are user friendly. Given the choice between making user friendly mod tools and making new game content they have a...
- Fri 3 Mar 2017 01:06
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Mod tools for Wargame Red Dragon, from Steel Division?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1895
Mod tools for Wargame Red Dragon, from Steel Division?
Eugen never liked mods, but apparently Paradox (my favorite developer) is forcing them to allow mods for Steel Division!
Assuming Steel Division uses the same engine as Wargame, is there any chance of using them backwards to mod Red Dragon?
Assuming Steel Division uses the same engine as Wargame, is there any chance of using them backwards to mod Red Dragon?
- Thu 9 Feb 2017 21:03
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Iran Redfor (F-14 in redfor!)
- Replies: 133
- Views: 13129
Re: Iran Redfor (F-14 in redfor!)
As far as the Iranian F-14 goes, it should be using not the AIM-54, but instead, the Iranian HAWK missiles that they strapped to the F-14.
This would be very interesting, more than just another interceptor, because you would be flinging heavy SAMs around.
This would be very interesting, more than just another interceptor, because you would be flinging heavy SAMs around.
- Wed 18 Jan 2017 01:08
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: .
- Replies: 120
- Views: 12495
Re: MiG-25PD, MiG-31, MiG-31M Should have the potential for additional flavour
It can already do this, as long as you do anything but evac or get killed, the missile will still keep aiming. The main issue there is that when you attack with LRAAMs, you either... Evac or get killed. I did, except it's a simple fact that not only are the 2 SA missiles nowhere near as good as 2 F...
- Tue 17 Jan 2017 19:48
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: .
- Replies: 120
- Views: 12495
Re: MiG-25PD, MiG-31, MiG-31M Should have the potential for additional flavour
I've highlighted my original question which you quoted yourself, because you've left it unanswered. It was also the single important issue in my entire post, which I'd like to hear your position on. Especially since you've claimed "Tomcat is in the perfect spot right now". But in no way a...
- Tue 17 Jan 2017 17:22
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: .
- Replies: 120
- Views: 12495
Re: MiG-25PD, MiG-31, MiG-31M Should have the potential for additional flavour
If your response will be that MiG-31 exists, then my next question would be what change you propose so that PACT receives an option to effectively threaten 4 F&F LRAAMs. Because currently 2 F&F LRAAMs and 2 SA LRAAMs with lower accuracy are not an effective threat to that and none of your s...
- Tue 17 Jan 2017 05:50
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: .
- Replies: 120
- Views: 12495
Re: MiG-25PD, MiG-31, MiG-31M Should have the potential for additional flavour
MiG-31M cannot get MRAAMs though because then NATO fanboys will say USSR must not get 2 cards of MiG-31Ms which carries LRAAMs and MRAAMs and it will be stuck in the hangar and worthless when faced with 2 tomcats. I'm not sure what you mean. There SHOULDN'T be two Mig-31Ms, one card is exactly the ...
- Mon 16 Jan 2017 23:57
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: .
- Replies: 120
- Views: 12495
Re: MiG-25PD, MiG-31, MiG-31M Should have the potential for additional flavour
Ok, I didn't understand that you were addressing a completely different issue. Then I agree that your suggestion would make the MiG-31 card actually usable, currently it's trash. Actually thinking about it, if they were given LRAAMs I might even consider putting them into my deck. They have LRAAMs,...
- Mon 16 Jan 2017 06:31
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: .
- Replies: 120
- Views: 12495
Re: MiG-25PD, MiG-31, MiG-31M Should have the potential for additional flavour
I think you fail to understand that 2x2 LRAMMS makes you untouchable You might not kill each time you release the missiles But you have a ZERO % chance of getting shot down because the enemy cannot get close Making MiG-31 get some extra MRAAMs will not change the fact that if the enemy has 2 tomcat...