In this type of game 1 enemy a.i or 4 enemy a.i are the exact same. If you have 3 humans vs the 1 a.i the a.i has the same resources as you 3 combined so basically it evens out. The only down side is we cannot have a.i allies. I would of liked to have 1 player 1 a.i vs another player and 1 a.i or me...

Cheers! Look forward to it.

It surely don't, i have seen fire burn down towns and spread through grass and forest, but i placed soldiers right in the middle of a fire and a couple leopard tanks and none seemed to take any damage at all.

I'll always hide or move my command unit away from danger so long as i have money or forces left to fight. Even if the enemy team is 2000 points ahead of my team.

If i have lost all my units and have no money then I'll either surrender or let the enemy destroy my command unit.

Played a lot of 4v4 games and the only ones that lag are the ones when one of the players has a high ping.

Best way to solve this problem, host your own 4v4 and kick anyone from the lobby that does not have a decent ping.

I have never seen anybody ever build a Challenger tank. I've only ever used them on a 6000pt game where i had the money to waste on units. They did a fantastic job in defending for me, but for the price they cost i can't see people using them over an Abrams or other good NATO tanks.

Music reminds me of Tom and Jerry, a cartoon i used to watch as a kid.

Yep, do what he said above me... then when you create a skirmish game... you must pick a deck to use.

Soooooooooooooooo, mind if i ask how things are going on the a.i front? are we close to a release? a week? 2 weeks? no idea?

Waiting patiently.

The only thing i disagree with here is reducing availability of units Unless I'm mistaken, the only availabilty reduction concerns prototype tanks. And as the name suggets, those tanks were prototypes (some even a failure but w/e) thus not widely available. Yes, but i'm sure if a full scale war had...