Search found 343 matches

Go to advanced search

by SkylineR33FTW
Thu 6 Jun 2013 02:01
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: ALB Press Reviews
Replies: 89
Views: 9426

Re: ALB Press Reviews

IGN gave it 8.4 http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/05/wargame-airland-battle-review I sense a theme among the reviews, most praising it for the multiplayer, yet criticizing the single player campaign for some of the same reasons many on the forums have cited. The write up is good, and i usually wo...
by SkylineR33FTW
Thu 30 May 2013 17:37
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Fjords - Bridge is a problem
Replies: 14
Views: 1067

Re: Fjords - Bridge is a problem

Tigga wrote:It could be worse - you could have pulled a 4v4 map like I did earlier. I'm personally going to hold off ranked until the obvious issues are fixed.


Whats your opinion on the NATO vs NATO type games that seem to be a usual thing?
by SkylineR33FTW
Thu 30 May 2013 15:54
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Please Confrontation only ranked matches
Replies: 7
Views: 525

Re: Please Confrontation only ranked matches

I havent seen you on teamspeak in a while, we could try some arranged 2v2s but then will probaly get 2 pact v 2 pact or 2 nato v 2 nato And the whole same nations fighting eachother really destroys realism and imersion of the cold war which is something this game trys to hit well, which they do, be...
by SkylineR33FTW
Thu 30 May 2013 15:35
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Please Confrontation only ranked matches
Replies: 7
Views: 525

Re: Please Confrontation only ranked matches

Posted about this myself yesterday also :lol:

Side note: We should play sometime dude!
by SkylineR33FTW
Thu 30 May 2013 00:54
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: 1v1 Ranked (NATO vs NATO)......
Replies: 7
Views: 616

Re: 1v1 Ranked (NATO vs NATO)......

FirestarterMKD wrote:I don't like it. :|


Glad someone else agrees, I quit the one ranked game I played due to the honest stupidity over it :lol: (Kind of remembered why I prefer 2v2 over 1v1 ATGM wars anyway) My opponent pretty much agreed (free win for him anyway :lol: )
by SkylineR33FTW
Thu 30 May 2013 00:47
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: 1v1 Ranked (NATO vs NATO)......
Replies: 7
Views: 616

Re: 1v1 Ranked (NATO vs NATO)......

I guess it's because they want players to be able to claim to have earnt their spot regardless of faction balance? I guess so, but for a team vs team type game it doesn't seem like the best decision really. I understand the balance complaints but surely it just comes down to how good you are anyway...
by SkylineR33FTW
Thu 30 May 2013 00:40
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: 1v1 Ranked (NATO vs NATO)......
Replies: 7
Views: 616

1v1 Ranked (NATO vs NATO)......

Why does this exist? It literally takes all PACT vs NATO thought process out of the game. I understand ranked has few players, but please make it NATO vs PACT instead of the same faction vs each other :lol: Literally makes no sense.
by SkylineR33FTW
Thu 23 May 2013 18:35
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Beta Patch (v 522)
Replies: 80
Views: 7968

Re: Beta Patch (v 522)

Great work as always :D
by SkylineR33FTW
Wed 22 May 2013 10:52
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Whats a unit you love, that no one else uses?
Replies: 74
Views: 4129

Re: Whats a unit you love, that no one else uses?

Swedswar1709 wrote:Hemvärnsmän, I like to use them in citys.(I do not spam them)


The German infantry right? (Not at home at the moment) Man I LOVE those things :D I can;t promise I don't like using all 32 to hold onto zones :lol:
by SkylineR33FTW
Mon 20 May 2013 03:40
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: 10v10 = future of Wargame?
Replies: 38
Views: 2136

Re: 10v10 = future of Wargame?

Feel like 10v10 hugely lacks any real strategical depth like 2v2 / 3v3 4v4 bring. Fun? Yes, Future of Wargame? ehhh probably not the best idea

Go to advanced search