Search found 140 matches

Go to advanced search

by rrev
Mon 2 Sep 2013 20:04
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: destruction vs conquest decks
Replies: 22
Views: 2111

Re: destruction vs conquest decks

Yeah Cat B/C are good - if you're NATO that is. CAT B actually doesn't lose all that much compared to C. It's hellfire and the top heavy armor primarily. Much of everything else is actually "better" (as in heck of allot more of them)- For conquest. Consider Command tank, extra defensive (=...
by rrev
Sun 1 Sep 2013 15:41
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Suggestion to nerf Heli-meta & buff AAA - Long-ish, PACT WIP
Replies: 98
Views: 4820

Re: Suggestion to nerf Heli-meta & buff AAA - Long-ish, PACT

Strange, I don't see any "heli-meta" and I've never encountered it in any format ever, since I quit 1v1 rank. I must play another game, guys? But anyways thank you for the chuckles and cheering up my Sunday, OP!
by rrev
Sun 1 Sep 2013 12:15
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Conquest - and where it's going
Replies: 56
Views: 3639

Re: Conquest - and where it's going

Great. So ranked mode is going to be playable finally.

And FLX can you please make Conquest the default mode for all formats (except maybe 10v10)?
by rrev
Sat 31 Aug 2013 17:35
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: T-64BM, a story....
Replies: 45
Views: 3964

Re: T-64BM, a story....

This one should have it's proper availability back.
Many other tanks got availability buff (such as the T64B which always had low availability for no reason), after that dumb global availability nerf to PACT (actually mostly USSR) tanks. Except this one.
by rrev
Sat 31 Aug 2013 11:47
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: The 2800 Range Meta Analysis and Solutions
Replies: 204
Views: 10712

Re: The 2800 Range Meta Analysis and Solutions

The ROF buff to ATGM tanks really put some of the USSR tanks in the OP category IMO. They previously had 6 ROF - now most of them have 10. That's a huge buff if you take advantage of it by turning it off/on, it's so easy now that it's sort of 'synced' with the main gun, having the same ROF. This was...
by rrev
Thu 29 Aug 2013 18:21
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: BMP-3 vs BMP-2 Obr 1986
Replies: 22
Views: 2465

Re: BMP-3 vs BMP-2 Obr 1986

Infantry choices depends allot on the map&format you're going to play. A city map justify taking lots of moto's /morskaya in cheap vehicles for instance, otherwise not really. A large open map warrants IFV's with good ATGM's. A complex map warrants taking a little bit of both. Speaking of the BM...
by rrev
Wed 28 Aug 2013 11:41
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: DLC2 announced!
Replies: 144
Views: 24846

Re: DLC2 announced!

I suppose they're meanwhile, working on Wargame RD while making this DLC. Otherwise it's not worth it (for me).
by rrev
Sun 25 Aug 2013 21:26
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Wargame combined battle
Replies: 31
Views: 3147

Re: the future of Airland battle

Engine upgrades. The main reason to buy it. But tbh, I'd buy anything these guys are throwing out. Their game is in the "special" (borderline unique ) category of RTS. The one-of-a-kind type of games that pop up once every half-a decade or so. I doubt any competitor will pop-up anytime soo...
by rrev
Sat 24 Aug 2013 13:09
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Super Etendard
Replies: 142
Views: 9972

Re: Super Etendard

They're OP. But they need to be to counter all those OP USSR prototype tanks.
by rrev
Sat 24 Aug 2013 00:19
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Is wargame:red dragon a real thing??
Replies: 6
Views: 901

Re: Is wargame:red dragon a real thing??

Looks good. Especially the map upgrades...I really hope for some engine upgrades regarding infantry.

Go to advanced search