Search found 19 matches

Go to advanced search

by Eiya
Mon 11 Dec 2017 08:11
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: WG4 Vision: What works, what doesn't, what needs improved?
Replies: 21
Views: 370

Re: WG4 Vision: What works, what doesn't, what needs improved?

... What I meant is if you want the game to be more of a simulator then some of units have to go because they don't belong on this scale and are you ok with that? I meant that the overall combat gameplay and unit stats should be leaning on simulator. As for some units needing to go in the case of a...
by Eiya
Sun 10 Dec 2017 14:01
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: WG4 Vision: What works, what doesn't, what needs improved?
Replies: 21
Views: 370

Re: WG4 Vision: What works, what doesn't, what needs improved?

More realistic? That means no smerch, interceptors, SAS, and all AA units with more range than OSA. Maybe as a game mode option? How to do a realistic and fun Naval mode in Wargame: Clone C:MA/NO in Iriszoom and then use that for naval battle resolution in the Campaign. Give up on the Multiplayer a...
by Eiya
Sat 9 Dec 2017 14:55
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: WG4 Vision: What works, what doesn't, what needs improved?
Replies: 21
Views: 370

Re: WG4 Vision: What works, what doesn't, what needs improved?

Wargame should stay as it is or become even more realistic. I have the same opinion too, though I definitely think WG should be more realistic instead of staying as it is (though no harm done either way). This is a big generalization but I personally think if all the units were truly based on 'real...
by Eiya
Fri 8 Dec 2017 12:57
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: WG4 Vision: What works, what doesn't, what needs improved?
Replies: 21
Views: 370

Re: WG4 Vision: What works, what doesn't, what needs improved?

I don't think NAV should be removed entirely, it's an interesting and good concept inherently, I believe it can be spectacular if done right.

It definitely needs more thought and commitment put into it than what we got in RD though.
by Eiya
Tue 24 Oct 2017 07:37
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: [Non-Included Nation] BLUE CHINA - Republic of China (Taiwan)
Replies: 20
Views: 2404

Re: [Non-Included Nation] BLUE CHINA - Republic of China (Taiwan)

Secondly, there's been a thread on this already, and while not as detailed as yours, I think it had a few more things, like the MLRS-APC. If you mean the Kungfeng MLRS systems, they're included under the ARTILLERY: ROCKET category in the OP. The list in the OP should cover most if not all systems i...
by Eiya
Thu 12 Oct 2017 11:16
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: [Non-Included Nation] BLUE CHINA - Republic of China (Taiwan)
Replies: 20
Views: 2404

Re: [Non-Included Nation] BLUE CHINA - Republic of China (Taiwan)

Added illustration for locally modified M10 GMC self-propelled gun variant, courtesy of Tanks Encyclopedia.
by Eiya
Fri 21 Apr 2017 14:01
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: [Non-Included Nation] BLUE CHINA - Republic of China (Taiwan)
Replies: 20
Views: 2404

Re: [Non-Included Nation] Republic of China (Taiwan)

Added some boats, WW2-era DD fans rejoice!

More detailed information on armaments and such will be added soon.

EDIT: Some more vehicles added, more images added and overall page streamlined to avoid eye and bandwidth strain
by Eiya
Sun 2 Apr 2017 07:18
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: [Non-Included Nation] BLUE CHINA - Republic of China (Taiwan)
Replies: 20
Views: 2404

Re: [Non-Included Nation] Republic of China (Taiwan)

Main list updated with some more info, new pictures and some faulty information removed. Highlights: "Possible" command truck removed (turned out to be a water carrier....) Leiting 2000 OOTF information removed and replaced with appropriate info (Platform mount from 2000+ was being picture...
by Eiya
Sun 2 Apr 2017 07:15
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: [Non-Included Nation] BLUE CHINA - Republic of China (Taiwan)
Replies: 20
Views: 2404

Re: [Non-Included Nation] Republic of China (Taiwan)

Wouldn't the ROC being in game lead to the game being banned in China (PRC)? Probably, assuming it wasn't even banned already, but actually if it was included in-game as the ROC it probably wouldn't be as likely to be as banned than if you included it as "TW". Funny politics in action, Ch...
by Eiya
Sat 1 Apr 2017 13:36
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: [Non-Included Nation] BLUE CHINA - Republic of China (Taiwan)
Replies: 20
Views: 2404

Re: [Non-Included Nation] Republic of China (Taiwan)

I included some non-self propelled systems and such since certain systems could reasonably be motorized, some can plausibly be motorized and I really am unsure if actual mounted versions exist or not for some of these (T-82 AA gun etc.)

Just trying to keep all plausible options all on the table!

Go to advanced search