Search found 82 matches

Go to advanced search

by Yorkie
Sat 22 Jun 2013 22:05
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: player levels in lobby + "house rules"
Replies: 2
Views: 471

Re: player levels in lobby + "house rules"

I for one am not in favour of this, how else is a person suppose to get any better if they are forced to play "low caliber" players.

Secondly kicking is becoming a problem, to anyone with a stock deck.
by Yorkie
Sat 22 Jun 2013 21:50
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10
Replies: 85
Views: 5526

Re: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10

Mitchverr wrote:Snipers used to be "cowards" etc, seriously, its a tactic, it isnt cowardly, its just, sigh.



Hell, it used to be cowardice to jump from a burning aeroplane O.o
by Yorkie
Sat 22 Jun 2013 19:28
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10
Replies: 85
Views: 5526

Re: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10

But it is cowardly. Now I understand why the Taliban is so pissed off all the time. It's especially cowardly because those rag-tag militias don't have any AA to speak of. Calling in CAS on men with AKs is a little bit overkill. Also cowardly is the use of roadside IEDs and suicide bombing, so neith...
by Yorkie
Sat 22 Jun 2013 18:54
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Best Deck for 10 vs 10?
Replies: 7
Views: 735

Re: Best Deck for 10 vs 10?

If you are playing with pugs, its better to have a jack of all trades deck rather than putting all your eggs in one basket.

imo
by Yorkie
Sat 22 Jun 2013 18:41
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10
Replies: 85
Views: 5526

Re: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10

Uncle_Uzi wrote:... snip...


Take a special kind of guy to come back and admit and concede [if not all ;)] points so kudos for that, and if you have learned a little from the thread then the rant was worth it in the end.
by Yorkie
Sat 22 Jun 2013 03:18
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10
Replies: 85
Views: 5526

Re: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10

rrev wrote:..... I don't see many good selling points of mixed pact.


Napalm =D
by Yorkie
Sat 22 Jun 2013 00:03
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10
Replies: 85
Views: 5526

Re: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10

naizarak wrote:nato airpower can be a little overwhelming but it's not unstoppable. there's usually at least 1 or 2 people on nato running air spam, so my 10v10 pact deck is basically completely anti-air. ..


yup nothing like 1k worth of points coming your way =D
by Yorkie
Fri 21 Jun 2013 22:39
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10
Replies: 85
Views: 5526

Re: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10

So the consensus here is that I'm a newb and should learn to play. Lets see, perhaps its the way you have articulated your grievances or lack there off 1. It takes a dedicated PACT Anti-air deck if you want to even THINK about providing even a modest defense against NATO air superiority. The proble...
by Yorkie
Fri 21 Jun 2013 18:58
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10
Replies: 85
Views: 5526

Re: NATO is ridiculously OP in 10v10

So you're complaining that you have to have a player with a specialist deck to defeat another player with a dedicated deck. And that a player with a specialist deck only uses that deck to its full advantage rather than throwing them into the meat grinder. And you're a pact player complaining about h...
by Yorkie
Fri 21 Jun 2013 18:45
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Chieftan mk.10 price buff.
Replies: 68
Views: 4346

Re: Chieftan mk.10 price buff.

If you're calling for a price increase on the Chief, then I would be most intrigue to see what your view about the Challenger 1 is.

Go to advanced search