It would be helpful if we could set a salvo length for artillery systems. Many artillery units in the game are just wasting its ammo and become useless because of this.

varis wrote:I think is already implemented?

My bad. It's already implemented for less then 600m distance and works well for ~(+- 60-70) degrees.

James-Bond wrote:What game mode?
In destruction that information is public...

In any mode.

Pondered how to be with planes with "no misses system". So, we can give a countermeasures ( in amount of ??? ) which can divert missiles with probability of 100% (95%?), or which will fire with a certain frequency. It's still can be a little chance to avoid missiles with no countermeasures.

Fodder wrote:-1

Why? Losses are always counted IRL. I'd like to know it.

The bar which shows a sum of losses (sum of unit prices) to represent who's leading the match. It can help players to adequately assess situation to build a strategy. Something like this:

For reverse:
if rangeFromAtoB( a, b ) < 500 then goBackwards else goNormaly
The reverse key is no longer needed (or it can be used if you need to reverse more then 500m)! It will simplify the unit management.

urogard wrote:But why post here instead of the european escalation forum then?

Because I didn't played the EE.

FrangibleCover wrote:I don't like to be the one to point this out, but there will never be another Wargame title. It's been abandoned by the developers.

Yeah, I know about it, but Eugen sill continue to create a war games so maybe they'll create something similar to WG with the new mechanics. I really hope so.

I suggest to compile the final price of the units from the sum of its components. Example - We have a "unit constructor" (classes inheritance). Each type of: armament/hit power, ammunition, optic, armor, health, speed, experience, etc. have its own price and the sum of its price == unit pr...