Next time you should charge more

Nah... we bet you paid a bunch of marketing luvvies a six figure sum to come up with that name

They have repeated the wargame mistake of allowing too much availability of many units (especially in phases B and C) resulting in too much deck min/maxing (ok this plays to the competitive scene but to the detriment of the casual/historical player). Every deck should have to take a percentage of &q...

I thought they were going to re-do Copenhagen, so is this map in addition to the new Copenhagen or in place of it?

Everytime a thread goes off topic - drain glass, weep, refil

Had it on a 10 v 10 LP Tactical on Mud - it was damn useful..!

The current Spec Ops fest is a bit ott - any future Wargame should consign special forces to low availability small (but effective) recon teams, limit shock infantry and reservist availability but offer more choices in line infantry (choice being differentiated by loadout and/or transport options an...

After posting an intro next step is to drop in on TeamSpeak then Morbius or one of the admins can set you up with TS permissions from there.

Mud Fight: Eh. Bravo side gets total advantage. Not only do they have a closer zone with a road going straight to if from main I don't think it's that clear cut - there is very little cover for a CV early into Delta so they get there quick but with nowhere to hide, in contrast Foxtrot may come into...

After tonight's rugby result I'm gonna go stomp an easy AI ANZAC deck