Search found 7580 matches

Go to advanced search

by Guggy
Tue 20 Mar 2018 16:41
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Community Balance Patch
Replies: 174
Views: 6135

Re: Community Balance Patch

Sleksa STILL needs to get a Spurdo mod published :evil: :evil: :evil:
by Guggy
Thu 15 Mar 2018 21:36
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Future DLC’s for Wargame Red Dragon
Replies: 52
Views: 2251

Re: Future DLC’s for Wargame Red Dragon

Hmmmm regarding the Italian DLC suggested, I'd like to be the first to state "Mama mia!!!" and to suggest "Thatsa spicy meataball!!!"
by Guggy
Mon 5 Mar 2018 18:28
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Maybe the USMC was right to go with the M103?
Replies: 161
Views: 3577

Re: Maybe the USMC was right to go with the M103?

Abrams can take a few hits frontally however once its hp is depleted it will die, and the hostile evildoer will get precisely and exactly the total sum of points as paid by the Abrams owner at the time of purchase, as per the Destruction clause.
by Guggy
Sun 4 Mar 2018 16:01
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Idea: Navy DLC
Replies: 9
Views: 536

Re: Idea: Navy DLC

Somewhere in the Pacific, Brutoni silently observes this thread through his periscope.
by Guggy
Fri 2 Mar 2018 16:55
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: World news thread
Replies: 3859
Views: 135060

Re: World news thread

Yeah thats sadly how things are. Nationalists ruin everything.
by Guggy
Wed 28 Feb 2018 22:27
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Maybe the USMC was right to go with the M103?
Replies: 161
Views: 3577

Re: Maybe the USMC was right to go with the M103?

I'm not trying to argue that not implementing aim-time changes has somehow led us to a terrible situation where the current meta exists to punish the world, just that the series not using the most current build and launching as effectively sync'd with the last-patch of the previous game meant things...
by Guggy
Wed 28 Feb 2018 22:09
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Maybe the USMC was right to go with the M103?
Replies: 161
Views: 3577

Re: Maybe the USMC was right to go with the M103?

Sorry if I was unclear. The change to tanks in EE that I'm referring to introduced variable ranges, aim times, and if I remember right the basis of RpM revisions that set the standard going into ALB. The problem was, when ALB came out, the aim time part of the equation never was reintroduced. That m...
by Guggy
Wed 28 Feb 2018 21:48
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Maybe the USMC was right to go with the M103?
Replies: 161
Views: 3577

Re: Maybe the USMC was right to go with the M103?

Because it slipped through, and all further balance improvements were thus based off an incomplete structure. This meant a large number of units that were meant to have a certain role (64 brawler) were double fucked because the role was secured by a fast aim time. Standardized aim time meant now you...
by Guggy
Wed 28 Feb 2018 20:52
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Maybe the USMC was right to go with the M103?
Replies: 161
Views: 3577

Re: Maybe the USMC was right to go with the M103?

The T-64 example is spot on, and indicative of one of the core problems.

Keep in mind the patch changing its range also established aim-time differences for tanks of different types. The fact that that was never reintroduced by RD was a big problem in my opinion.
by Guggy
Wed 20 Sep 2017 17:08
Forum: Modding
Topic: Revised Campaign Mod
Replies: 852
Views: 88183

Re: Revised Campaign Mod

Which units are engaged in the battle? I'm curious if particular casualties could be causing it, or perhaps a crash from the map icon/pawn for the affiliated BG being destroyed.

Go to advanced search