
Search found 5096 matches
- Sun 4 Aug 2019 10:47
- Forum: Modding
- Topic: [MOD] Wargame: 1991
- Replies: 143
- Views: 74069
Re: [MOD] Wargame: 1991
Best mod out there with the best SU faction
.

- Tue 2 Jan 2018 14:23
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: World news thread
- Replies: 3927
- Views: 327825
Re: World news thread
The good 'ol memes.
- Mon 13 Feb 2017 11:49
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Armored Warfare
- Replies: 1600
- Views: 134997
Re: Armored Warfare
Yes, quite a hard split to be honest, especially with ITS members spreading their "truths" on reddit and so on. I am a little sad to see this being done right around PTS test and a soft relaunch as this is about the worst time to do it. I am also sad to see Felix (Nakoomba) gone as he mana...
- Sun 11 Dec 2016 21:02
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
- Replies: 657
- Views: 52273
Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
There were three flamethrower tank projects from WW2. 481 > OT-54, 482 > OT-55 and 483 also produced on T-55 chassis
no OT-62 project exists despite being mentioned widely in western sources.
no OT-62 project exists despite being mentioned widely in western sources.
- Tue 6 Dec 2016 19:12
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Armored Warfare
- Replies: 1600
- Views: 134997
Re: Armored Warfare

Same DM as from here?
- Sun 4 Dec 2016 16:44
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Eugen should take a look at tank acc
- Replies: 61
- Views: 6861
Re: Eugen should take a look at tank acc
Steamfunk wrote:Description of the 1V517 unit, also from Stefan Kotsch -
Yeah, ok, but BV-55 doesn't have all of that. Manual pages 8-9-10-11 outline exactly what Azazel wrote.
- Sat 3 Dec 2016 15:15
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Armored Warfare
- Replies: 1600
- Views: 134997
Re: Armored Warfare
I hope you aren't an arty player 

- Tue 29 Nov 2016 15:33
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: VDV 90' RPG-29
- Replies: 35
- Views: 4322
Re: VDV 90' RPG-29
>Take the heaviest and bulkiest AT launcher to date.
>Give it to the most mobile branch of service where mobility and air deployments are key.

>Give it to the most mobile branch of service where mobility and air deployments are key.
Lumi wrote:Is there any factual evidence.

- Mon 28 Nov 2016 08:31
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: T-72 line authenticity errors in W:RD
- Replies: 194
- Views: 22040
Re: T-72 line authenticity errors in W:RD
I don't think just an LRF should justify for 2275 by itself. T-72A doesn't even have lead calculation. Lead calc and ranging should impact accuracy, ballistics should impact distance IMO. 2275 on a T-72 wouldn't really require any significant ballistics adjustment since the straight trajectory goes...
- Sun 27 Nov 2016 00:21
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: T-72 line authenticity errors in W:RD
- Replies: 194
- Views: 22040
Re: T-72 line authenticity errors in W:RD
Tanks that IMO have no place in the soviet arsenal- T-34-85 (1969) - Phased to storage by 1970 this is too much of a useless joke. I felt that way in alpha of RD, I still feel this way now. T-55 - As explained previously in this very thread. Nothing over the T-55A except the unused hull coax. Doesn'...