Is 101st airborne training the same as regulars too? Technically the "training" was about the same yes however as a rapid deployment unit they received much more of it (and as time went on towards the 90s, more specialized light infantry based tactics etc), plus... They deployed more ofte...

Wasn't it attempted during the dev period for ALB and everything was just a white amorphous mess?

So, with the recent push to make motorized decks more viable, and the release of the Reds Pack, I think it should be noted that as of right now, the Yugo motorized deck is limited to three cards of BTR and a comparable amount of Mi-8. To me, it sorta feels like the issue of US motorized running out ...

5 HE >>>>> 4 HE. It's the difference between 2 shotting and 3 shotting a plane. So 2 igla squads will not kill a plane, in fact you need to invest 45 as opposed to 40 pts for stinger to kill a plane with them... and with the lacking accuracy and insignificant range advantage over stinger in vs plan...

Ooh, I like it! Awesome work!

QUAD wrote:make all naval units able to go on land, problem solved. And the best part is, its equally as real as current naval warfare ingame.

We had that happen in Beta, and we all know how that went

The day Wargame becomes entirely predictable is the day I stop playing it. I don't touch SC2, even with the proverbial 10-foot pole, because it's just *too* predictable. And where's the fun in something clinical? Real life is fun because it's unpredictable. Wargame is fun because it's unpredictable....

I just enjoyed that the opposing team just began to send progressively less effective units against a stationary T-72. God bless post-DLC pub games.

So far, I think the only glaring issues are that the Israeli tanks are a bit on the underpriced side and Maglan is, well, Maglan. The rest seemed fine both playing as and against.

As for Achzarit CV, just bump it to like 145 and call it a day.