Search found 201 matches
- Thu 6 Oct 2016 17:47
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Laser guided bombs are dire. Bad, bad change.
- Replies: 95
- Views: 8702
Re: Laser guided bombs are dire. Bad, bad change.
I'm not experiencing these laser guided bombs in being bad. They still hit their target and two can still instant kill a T-80UM so this just seems like the OP just wants them to be overpowered again.
- Wed 5 Oct 2016 22:03
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Israel tank historical balance suggestion.
- Replies: 176
- Views: 15531
Suggestion for Merkava tanks
I think the frontal armor for Merkava's are fine considering the engine is positioned in the front but I do think there should be an engine malfunction when getting penetrated in the front to show its real life disadvantage.
- Wed 5 Oct 2016 17:44
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Antisemitism
- Replies: 41
- Views: 4545
Re: Antisemitism
This Israel deck is absolutely badly percieved in the community. I just took a "one in the oven" for free, while one guy playing the IDF was giving up. And between the "kick the jews ! Israel OP !" and this : i'm waiting for the biggest ban-hammer of the History. I am not myself...
- Thu 30 Jun 2016 17:48
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Proposal: f117 availability
- Replies: 44
- Views: 3951
Re: Proposal: f117 availability
Yeah, the Nighthawk should be 2 per card. The closest comparison in game is the GR7. The harrier carries the same payload, and costs 120 points while coming at 2/card. It does not get stealth, but it does get 40 ecm and decent multirole ability The nighthawk costs more, has no multirole ability, an...
- Wed 22 Jun 2016 03:06
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Wrecks and Rocks cancer map
- Replies: 16
- Views: 2097
Re: Wrecks and Rocks cancer map
Would you care to elaborate or illustrate that extremely helpful point of view ? http://i.imgur.com/zUavynn.jpg My 2 cents - India is easier to defend and harder to neutralize than Charlie. It's fairly easy to push into the part of Charlie across the river, while the equivalent location for India c...
- Wed 22 Jun 2016 03:04
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: 1v1/Ranked deck choices
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4151
Re: 1v1/Ranked deck choices
whatever you do, do not do any of this: Just play Dutch+German Armored like everybody else in ranked. Also: Remove SASR; Remove Diggers; Add Pioneers/Commandos '90. Remove Falcon (lol) Remove Lynx 20mm and get a proper TOW 2 gunship. 2 cards of Eurofighter Spam, F111C, and Voodoo; GR 7 is irrelevan...
- Wed 22 Jun 2016 02:30
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Wrecks and Rocks cancer map
- Replies: 16
- Views: 2097
Re: Wrecks and Rocks cancer map
Nemo KB wrote:A disingenuous question makes for a valueless discussion. Though in this case, it seems to have made for little discussion at all.
Further, if you've got the attention of a dev already, then it's irrelevant whether you get ours.
You're not fun.
- Wed 22 Jun 2016 02:29
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Proposal: f117 availability
- Replies: 44
- Views: 3951
Re: Proposal: f117 availability
The closest comparison in game is the GR7. The harrier carries the same payload, and costs 120 points while coming at 2/card. It does not get stealth, but it does get 40 ecm and decent multirole ability The nighthawk costs more, has no multirole ability, and comes at only 1/card. I think this shoul...
- Wed 22 Jun 2016 02:25
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Wrecks and Rocks cancer map
- Replies: 16
- Views: 2097
Re: Wrecks and Rocks cancer map
Agreed. The map is really unbalanced. You could word the thread more constructively however. It got your attention, like clickbait. Getting attention is one thing, getting your request done is another. Hell, you've got my attention, but do you think I can do anything about it? A dev that does matte...
- Tue 21 Jun 2016 20:48
- Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
- Topic: Wrecks and Rocks cancer map
- Replies: 16
- Views: 2097
Re: Wrecks and Rocks cancer map
Sweedish_Gunner wrote:Agreed. The map is really unbalanced.
You could word the thread more constructively however.
It got your attention, like clickbait.