Cullen's Hound wrote:The 91st was Heer not Luftwaffe, it was trained as a Grenadier division. It was not Fallschirmjager in terms of equipment, morale, or training and not equivalent to allied airborne.

I know that, but for the purposes of this game, and game balance, it considers the 91. Luftlande an airborne deck.

IMO it should be a high priority to add at least an Allied Airborne and a German Infantry Division to the beta. This way each side has one of every type of division - Armored, Infantry, and Airborne. Until we have that, balance discussions are kind of moot... we don't have an apples-to-apples compar...

Well done, I'm glad you're doing a Division of the Week.

Oh boy, he's back? Time to conduct Steelth Maneuvers while playing Steelth Division.

The bit I'm more worried about is an attacker's advantage against towns. Infantry on their own were not particularly good at taking out FSVs and especially tanks in the era and I wouldn't be surprised if we see a Churchill/Sherman/Unironic Char B1 meta in the early days of the game as effective FSV...

There have been oblique references into articles to some kind of 'we're cut off' mechanic in the game. Things like you need an officer unit to lead a daring behind enemy lines ambush or some such. It could just be a journalist's hyperbole, but it wouldn't surprise me if there was indeed some kind me...

marecek05 wrote:Also, we would get to keep CornProducts around...

That might be a good argument not to do Czech/Slovak voice acting

Can machine guns on tanks and vehicles shoot aircraft, like really inaccurate SPAAGs in Wargame?

I hope recon phase is not for recon only, 10 min fighting only with this kind of units (assuming Wargame standards) can be a bit boring imo. But if light tanks are involved that's another thing. We know for a fact that there are more than just recon units available in these phases. For example, you...

[EUG]MadMat wrote:No, keys won't be sent before Wednesday.

Cool, thanks for the info.