Anybody can confirm it works on Mac? Cause it won't launch on mine

Fade2Gray wrote:

yrk yrk wrote:The point is made, now give the Obr 89 60%acc and let's move on

Still not worth it in comparison to the T-80U.

Well it's not like it's gonna happen anyway. Best we could hope for would be a 135pt price to bring it to Pact level, and that still wouldn't make it an attractive choice.

Why on earth would anyone use the T-72B OBR 1989 when you can just take the T-80U,which is vastly superior? Sudently i feel lonely about my beloved T-72B Obr. 89. So, have you tried t-80u? I suppose, no... - Yes i did, less armour everywhere than frontal, especialy -2 top armor. I prefer survive an...

There is still a lot of weird pricing on the URSS side...when you see the quality of the tanks that nato can field for 60 points, it's embarrassing that this hasn't yet been modified. The only thing they have going for them is armor, and that doesn't mean much compared to the accuracy and firepower ...

Well, i'm on mac and the game won't start after the update... just me?

Edit: got out of the beta and redownloaded. My bad

Edit2: i'm confused, are we still in beta? cuz beta won't start on Mac, and regular game doesn't have the update.

[EUG]MadMat wrote:

lorenzfx wrote:Has the linux version been released as well? (If so, I'm going home now )

We're still testing both Mac & Linux.
They'll be released either before leaving the studio tonight, or tomorrow.

oh. I'm on mac and can't start the game since the fix. Anyone else?

Spetsnaz GRU in btr-90

Darkus1155 wrote:

Random wrote:P.S I played a round vs AI and my Mi28 missiles seemed to miss rarely, but it depends if I'm playing multi or not.

Ok, i want to believe that The last time one attacked me in an AI game, it fired 6 missiles in a row and didn't score a single hit. Given its stats, that's just ridiculous.

I specifically remember something to the effect of, back when DLC 1 was first patched, they said 'We fixed the bug with ATGMs but only partially fixed it based on player feedback' because everyone was like 'whoa I love that atgms don't hit stuff now! I don't need to use smoke!' Anecdotally, I feel ...

Sweedish_Gunner wrote:

Random wrote:Why do you think they are missing more then they should according to their stats?

I know. Everyone is jumping on the 'ATGM's are bugged train'. Where's the proof? I find that ATGM's perform as advertised.

Huh, try the french milan 3, german milan 2 and russian mi 28?