Search found 3818 matches

Go to advanced search

by Kraxis
Tue 16 Jul 2013 23:37
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Nato tanks are ridic.
Replies: 182
Views: 11583

Re: Nato tanks are ridic.

Just to be different... When does it stop HE, or rather what are the levels of AV vs HE? I think I have gotten the AV vs AP down alright, but how does this work? Armour 2 is when HE damage starts to be reduced. Check this: http://www.wargame-ee.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=93&t=28610&start=30 T...
by Kraxis
Tue 16 Jul 2013 23:14
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Pact Nato Balance
Replies: 51
Views: 3765

Re: Pact Nato Balance

So no, a long time to produce a tank would not be the problem, it would be the total effort.. Still the effort for a one-man-nation-tank would be considerably higher, as I stated, so following your argumentation* it should be more expensive(ingame). * Your argumentation: The T80U was cheaper in pro...
by Kraxis
Tue 16 Jul 2013 19:15
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Pact Nato Balance
Replies: 51
Views: 3765

Re: Pact Nato Balance

No. This is turning facts to your favor. Would you want tanks which were produced slowly and in small numbers to be more expensive just because there were less ressources allocated to? If you have a one man nation building a tank, it took more time to build than a T80U right? Would like this tank t...
by Kraxis
Tue 16 Jul 2013 19:04
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Nato tanks are ridic.
Replies: 182
Views: 11583

Re: Nato tanks are ridic.

Rolands have about 70-80% chance of instadropping Mi24s before the Kokon hits Wrong. HE 5 vs armor 1 and strenght 10 means that even if both missiles from the Roland hit, the Hind's still there with 2 points left. So actually, the chance of a Roland instadropping an Mi-24 without criticals is 0%. A...
by Kraxis
Tue 16 Jul 2013 18:54
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Pact Nato Balance
Replies: 51
Views: 3765

Re: Pact Nato Balance

If we talk economy, then we also have to take into account the industrial price paid in construction. And that's not money. It is manhours, resources and so on. Since it appears we only have the pricetags, then I would argue that the Challenger is in fact cheaper given the massively lower wages paid...
by Kraxis
Tue 16 Jul 2013 14:35
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Campaign Replay
Replies: 4
Views: 689

Re: Campaign Replay

Would certainly be nice.
by Kraxis
Tue 16 Jul 2013 14:34
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Battle time limit needs adjusting!
Replies: 42
Views: 3812

Re: Battle time limit needs adjusting!

That could work. Your brigade frontloads in order to finish the battle now, and will suffer if it can't win.
by Kraxis
Mon 15 Jul 2013 21:43
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Loved the tutorials - why no scenarios like those or editor?
Replies: 10
Views: 980

Re: Loved the tutorials - why no scenarios like those or edi

Scripted missions/scenarios is what singleplayer lacks imo, i remember myself never getting past the 3rd or 4th mission in EE, the one you had to defend a bridge for like 30 minutes, they were quite fun, too bad i didnt understand anything about the game lol Sounds like '1914 again', certainly one ...
by Kraxis
Mon 15 Jul 2013 18:06
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Unusual kills
Replies: 80
Views: 7460

Re: Unusual kills

katt wrote:Image

A-10 killing Su-27 with the gun?
by Kraxis
Mon 15 Jul 2013 18:04
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Loved the tutorials - why no scenarios like those or editor?
Replies: 10
Views: 980

Re: Loved the tutorials - why no scenarios like those or edi

nats wrote:My concern isnt with the tutorials being bad (I learned to play the game from them) rather than they were very entertaining and I would like more objective based scenarios like them!

You know, I have to agree. They were quite fun.

Go to advanced search