Search found 306 matches

Go to advanced search

by Mukip
Fri 13 Dec 2013 22:57
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: New 1v1 maps getting far too large
Replies: 60
Views: 2047

Re: New 1v1 maps getting far too large

Not to mention, many forces have units that are ideally suited for independent operations away from the main force, acting in a 'light force' screening or flanking role - zhalo, IFV, Cav tanks, light and fast atgm carriers, etc. This is theory crafting nonsense that wouldn't apply in a real match o...
by Mukip
Fri 13 Dec 2013 20:04
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: New 1v1 maps getting far too large
Replies: 60
Views: 2047

Re: New 1v1 maps getting far too large

I do think you can make a strong case for Ornskoldsvik specifically to be removed from 1v1 map rotation. I know that at least one of the usual suspects who came into this thread does not have an ELO ranking. That is relevant, because 1v1 ranked map rotation only affects people who play ranked matche...
by Mukip
Fri 13 Dec 2013 15:28
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Orskolsvik should be 4v4 not 3v3
Replies: 14
Views: 568

Re: Orskolsvik should be 4v4 not 3v3

It should be removed from 1v1 ranked.
by Mukip
Wed 11 Dec 2013 10:55
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Challenger 1 mk2 - only armored
Replies: 26
Views: 1429

Re: Challenger 1 mk2 - only armored

Example? Try to make a UK air assault/marine/mechanized/motorized deck, it is a joke. A lot of deck specializations aren't that good for most nations. But the UK's are relatively decent. air assault/marine/motorized are decent in conquest because the UK has lots of good helicopters and fast wheeled...
by Mukip
Fri 6 Dec 2013 17:49
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2
Replies: 227
Views: 7955

Re: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2

I doubt there are many Soviet players that include seven cards worth of T-80's in their deck.
by Mukip
Fri 6 Dec 2013 16:27
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2
Replies: 227
Views: 7955

Re: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2

You don't win matches by cramming as many heavy tanks into your deck as possible. For instance, you do not build a Soviet deck by including every single card of T-80's that are available.
by Mukip
Fri 6 Dec 2013 16:14
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2
Replies: 227
Views: 7955

Re: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2

The deck has not been vastly altered. Britain lost a card of Mk 1's in exchange for a card of Mk.2's.
by Mukip
Fri 6 Dec 2013 15:44
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2
Replies: 227
Views: 7955

Re: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2

DoktorvonWer wrote:A) Mk.2 at 145 points, 4 trained is a fancy expensive prototype, not a general-use MBT, surely.


:roll:
by Mukip
Fri 6 Dec 2013 15:13
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2
Replies: 227
Views: 7955

Re: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2

I'd hardly call 6 hardened or 4 veteran heavies for a single card severely limited. You will also be able to buy an extra four Challenger 1 Mk. 2's when the DLC is released, which have an improved stabilizer so their accuracy is not to shabby either.
by Mukip
Fri 6 Dec 2013 14:19
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2
Replies: 227
Views: 7955

Re: I Don't Want The Challenger Mk.2

That was my point, having only 3 decks viable makes for a boring and repetitive game. All minors (not just the UK) should have at least one reason to play them, whether it's great infantry, a good tank selection, the AA piece from god, or what have you. Indeed, it is a topic that applies to every m...

Go to advanced search