Search found 144 matches

Go to advanced search

by beares
Fri 27 Jan 2017 16:56
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Bumbar is from 2005 and didn't enter service until 2012. Why is this in the game?
Replies: 89
Views: 7416

Re: Bumbar is from 2005 and didn't enter service until 2012. Why is this in the game?

HrcAk47 wrote:
beares wrote:
HrcAk47 wrote:PzF3-T600 1996


I thought 1996 was ITF? The SU-27PU for instance has 1996 as its in-game year (regardless of its first flight year).


1991 for regular stuff.
Up to and including 1995 for automatic proto.

Everything else is at Eugen's discretion.


What is meant by regular stuff?
by beares
Fri 27 Jan 2017 15:46
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Bumbar is from 2005 and didn't enter service until 2012. Why is this in the game?
Replies: 89
Views: 7416

Re: Bumbar is from 2005 and didn't enter service until 2012. Why is this in the game?

PzF3-T600 1996 I thought 1996 was ITF? The SU-27PU for instance has 1996 as its in-game year (regardless of its first flight year). In fact, Akku listed it as an ITF weapon, not an extended timeline weapon. He never seems to have claimed that it was OOTF: WIth Russia, Germany and USA it's actually ...
by beares
Wed 25 Jan 2017 18:02
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Fine tuning Yugoslavia
Replies: 214
Views: 19156

Re: Fine tuning Yugoslavia

BTW are the Pado 90 supposed to have the stats they currently possess on their primaries? They seem to have an SMG with carbine range. Is that intentional or did EUGEN simply forget them?
by beares
Tue 24 Jan 2017 18:46
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: If the timeline was extended to 1997, what prototypes would become suddenly available?
Replies: 297
Views: 21621

Re: If the timeline was extended to 1997, what prototypes would become suddenly available?

I saw this on the M8 AGS for USA. "One such configuration could include a crew compartment for a 4-Soldier fire team akin to the IDF's Merkava heavy tank. With the Hybrid Electric Drive's flexibility, a better center of gravity and space utilization is realized. Weight reduction and related mi...
by beares
Sun 15 Jan 2017 19:29
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: GBU 8/B HOBOS vs GBU 27
Replies: 8
Views: 1331

GBU 8/B HOBOS vs GBU 27

Is there an actual difference between them (GBU 8/B and GBU 27) in-game? I know that one is electro-optical and the other SALH but what effects does that have in the game? The stats on the card say they perform the same (same dispersion, suppression, HE etc...)?
by beares
Sat 7 Jan 2017 09:36
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Mig-29 9.13 Spam Tactic
Replies: 30
Views: 3496

Re: Mig-29 9.13 Spam Tactic

frostypooky wrote:
But the thing is, you need 2 migs to do that.


less ECM if you sideshot


Is this true?
by beares
Tue 3 Jan 2017 11:10
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 48732

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

I must be mistaken but I thought the T-80U already had 3 TAV in the game? Or are you not talking about TAV at all? Argh, my mistake, I meant 4 Top AV, T-80U's top armor is no weaker than the T-72Bs and should be better than the M1 Abrams series as they all naked nor has any design focus on TAV Glad...
by beares
Tue 3 Jan 2017 10:25
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 48732

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

Is it too hard for T-80U to have 3 top armor? It has ERA mounted on toparmor but still weaker then the non-ERA mounted one? Soviet poor steel and hungry ERA is less that mighty western steel. Also funny in terms of overall top weak zone. http://www.btvt.narod.ru/1/tank3.files/image010.jpg LOL, I gu...
by beares
Fri 30 Dec 2016 13:51
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Kutel `75: ROFL
Replies: 18
Views: 1717

Re: Kutel `75: ROFL

axnone wrote:so this is what happened with "rifle fixed: long and short range accuracy were inverted"?


Samurai infantry. Much flavorous.
by beares
Mon 26 Dec 2016 20:15
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Fine tuning Scandinavia
Replies: 264
Views: 24479

Re: Fine tuning Scandinavia

Rimgrimner wrote:
nande wrote:"decent" pen, lmao


Well its the only scandi unit with higher pen than 23. its "Decent" for scandi. ;)


I thought Denmark got TOW-2 helos?

Go to advanced search

cron