Search found 100 matches

Go to advanced search

by ilias
Wed 6 Sep 2017 06:28
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10317

Re: No C-300 ?

Back alive, that moving in direction to become usual
by ilias
Wed 6 Sep 2017 05:00
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10317

Re: No C-300 ?

servers have fallen again?
by ilias
Wed 6 Sep 2017 02:28
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10317

Re: No C-300 ?

Sorry for missed respondings; .. thanks for plenty of info about the theme all the time, i really appreciate the detalisation ) if you mean in .. It simply made it too hard to b.. Adding patriot made things more realistical, that what it wasn't added to other countries which used it: i think its kin...
by ilias
Tue 5 Sep 2017 05:00
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10317

Re: No C-300 ?

Mike wrote:
ilias wrote:
Mike wrote:I believe the MIM-104 was a replacement for the HAWK and Nike Hercules. The former is why it's in game and the later is why it shouldn't be. :lol:

S-300 long time was, and still stays, you think its not reason for adding ?


Source for that reasoning?

?
by ilias
Tue 5 Sep 2017 01:32
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10317

Re: No C-300 ?

Mike wrote:I believe the MIM-104 was a replacement for the HAWK and Nike Hercules. The former is why it's in game and the later is why it shouldn't be. :lol:

S-300 long time was, and still stays, you think its not reason for adding ?
by ilias
Tue 5 Sep 2017 01:01
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: no US's MRAPs :(
Replies: 30
Views: 4250

Re: no US's MRAPs :(

Yes, need MRAPs in Wargame. I don't want to just roleplay myself in a Bradley, I want to be able to roleplay myself on a MAXXPRO and a CAIMEN as well. While in wargame is not inf units separation system ( :) , that would be fun), and recognition of number of mens in group on transporting no need in...
by ilias
Tue 5 Sep 2017 00:43
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10317

Re: No C-300 ?

47andrej wrote:..

looks like it is, although i'm not really new
Steamfunk wrote:..

Moskow is protected by S-300P, its even more mobile than Antey (S-300V)
molnibalage wrote:..

smeerch..
LR SAM is not firstine thing
(though i'm not saying it wasn't not intended--pretty much could be used)
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 18:05
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10317

Re: No C-300 ?

.. its just quotes, question not to you, i inserted it in first post Its such a wonderfull conversation, truly as in best Wargame times. And thats still over 3,5 years after release. How can such a dedicated fanbase be ignored? Eugen, please. its second post like that, what so amusement in the conv...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 17:39
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10317

Re: No C-300 ?

GARGEAN wrote:
ilias wrote:you *gd;se/es*d*f/af

And what that's supposed to mean.

Sor, i just bit angry that i can't finally get sleeping (not because of this topic), hope the answer in previous,previous than that one post is fine
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 17:26
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10317

Re: No C-300 ?

GARGEAN wrote:
ilias wrote:you *gd;se/es*d*f/af

And what that's supposed to mean.

Letting you choose

Go to advanced search