Search found 100 matches

Go to advanced search

by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 17:23
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 9862

Re: No C-300 ?

Okay, yes, on battlefield would be logically to see Antey, but i'm not sure about their production, while S-300P versions definitely were produced in enough counts GARGEAN you *gd;se/es*d*f/af It does fits the game fine, for example i had no problems with 7000 range patriots playing for Red If you m...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 17:09
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 9862

Re: No C-300 ?

GARGEAN wrote:
molnibalage wrote:Anti airplane range of S-300V/V1 was only 75 km comparing to 68 km or MIM-104A missile. So gibing 7km in WG would be strange...
75/68 is not the same as 7/5.6 km...

Yeap, cause 9M82 missile never existed...

Minimally: 5V55R was produced, which have range of 90km
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 16:52
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 9862

Re: No C-300 ?

according to ~ scaling of Russian armed forces certain vehicles count comparative to US's, in the game could present ~0.4-2.1 S-300, adding 1(max count in desk) to USSR for fairness, with 7000 range(more than Patriot) wouldn't hurt anything, S-300 is even some kind of national symbol, it would be p...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 16:43
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 9862

Re: No C-300 ?

Do you know Patriots count at that period ? Only US or other nations either? MIM-104A/B - Standard/SOJC 1980-85 USA 6750 M USD 60 battery 3600 missile 1983 Germany 2100 M USD 28 battery 896 missile 1983 Netherland 333 M USD 4 battery 60 missile (was not even a full battalion with 6xFU FU = battery)...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 14:51
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 9862

Re: No C-300 ?

Can't get sleeping, got reached by team member asking for workboard. .. i would say its like totaly up to developers' choise, there was | used or could be used in war | self propelled S-300 for army air defence which was capable to provide LR anti aircraft defence ?|there was few of them ? -- then ...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 14:42
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 9862

Re: No C-300 ?

Can't get sleeping, got reached by team member asking for workboard. .. i would say its like totaly up to developers' choise, there was | used or could be used in war | self propelled S-300 for army air defence which was capable to provide LR anti aircraft defence ?|there was few of them ? -- then t...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 13:42
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 9862

Re: No C-300 ?

Stop, wasn't PAC-2 pretty much not prototype in 90s,
ok thats too mutch misunderstandings, i'll go sleep, will appreciate sorting it out and some explanations why S-300 not in game to see next night )
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 13:16
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 9862

Re: No C-300 ?

Few minutes ago chykka said something, hope he do not mind, posting it as first possible(on my look) reason why S-300 not in game now Subject: No C-300 ? Why in the game is no C-300 with some acceptable ranges missile ? missiles (HAWK's Operational range: 45–50km) If they were unprototyped. Mixed De...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 13:02
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 9862

Re: No C-300 ?

.. Hope the last fixed description will not be missed in favor of first one (i just whole night coded and deved. some thing (1:58 PM already now), thinks are going one around another, another round and back :) ), sorry for the first one, wasted your time on reading You really should as i wrote in f...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 12:48
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 9862

Re: No C-300 ?

Fodder wrote:The real reason why its not ingame.
Becuz it was design to target strategic bombers and missiles, which are not ingame

Patriots only ingame becuz US infantry sucks and USA needed motorized AA

Sorry, do not see connection (between patriots and US infantry) ) , i'm missing something ?

Go to advanced search