Search found 100 matches

Go to advanced search

by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 12:19
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10272

Re: No C-300 ?

0. In game we have not things which been made in 90s, we have what was used in 90s That's lol. NASAMS anyone? Macbeth? Crotale-NG? *****, do not go rediculous, yes and maybe before 1995, because the damn game covers big time range with top end in 1995 and maybe for fun or gameplay what wasn't used ...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 12:17
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10272

Re: No C-300 ?

.. sorry but i so much hate dumb posts like that, if you have anything to contradict what was written before, just write it, do not post opinion crab about your reading of posts, 0. In game we have not things which been made in 90s, we have what was used in 90s "worse" i meant (and one hi...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 11:41
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10272

Re: No C-300 ?

After the patriot drop I think it was universal opinion that ultra-long ranged modern SAM's were not the best idea... if you mean in the game (from 7000 to 5000) i totally disagree with that ridiculousity cause it was made based of certain view on gameplay and totaly against realism, but what we ha...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 11:26
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10272

Re: No C-300 ?

0. Russian SAMS not actively developing because no need in it, S-300 is one of superior AA systems in a world unlike Buk which banaly worse, 1. USA have patriots, thats point of S-300 presence in game (i wrote HAWK's range as example for explanation of S-300 in game presence accordance) 2. Why you ...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 10:44
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10272

Re: No C-300 ?

USSR should swap the Su-27PU, the Su-27M and possibly the Yak-141 for the S-300 with earlyish missiles. Then the US should swap the Patriot for a Super Hornet meme fighter and useful loadouts for at least some of its strike aircraft (F-16C and A-7E, I'm looking at you here). Then the Tomcats should...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 09:30
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10272

Re: No C-300 ?

Cause first: this is S-300, not C-300. Second: it is in every iteration blatantly superior to HAWK, and third - we don't need S-300V, we need Buk-M2. But everyone knows that Soviet works on AA stopped in 80s, cause who need those modern SAMs? 0. Russian SAMS not actively developing because no need ...
by ilias
Mon 4 Sep 2017 08:33
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No C-300 ?
Replies: 117
Views: 10272

No C-300 ?

Why in the game is no C-300 with some acceptable ranges missile ? missiles (HAWK's Operational range: 45–50km) .. sure what you will not state against that preciseness of comparative equipment count in Wargame is pretty far from real (even not counting things like: TOS-1 which's count even now ~15 (...
by ilias
Sun 3 Sep 2017 00:19
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: no US's MRAPs :(
Replies: 30
Views: 4236

Re: no US's MRAPs :(

KaiserGütinand wrote:Isn't the Spejdervogn M/95 (MOWAG Eagle) basically what you're looking for? <.<

If you mean it as Danish army 's one example then probably yep
by ilias
Sat 2 Sep 2017 02:23
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: no US's MRAPs :(
Replies: 30
Views: 4236

Re: no US's MRAPs :(

Markenzwieback wrote:Why are we even discussion something that will definitely not make it into the game?

Modding ? :) , yeah, probably should post it in modding thread
by ilias
Sat 2 Sep 2017 00:49
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: no US's MRAPs :(
Replies: 30
Views: 4236

Re: no US's MRAPs :(

*checked in game,: would say MRAPs could be 1,1,1,1 10 points, Stryker 2,1,1,1 or 2,2,1,1 (didn't readed about it) 15-20 points (depends on armament)

Go to advanced search