Search found 265 matches

Go to advanced search

by hanspeter_schnitzel
Thu 17 Apr 2014 22:57
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: NATO symbolic
Replies: 0
Views: 395

NATO symbolic

Can we please get the NATO symbols for the battlegroups in the campaign? I have NATO symbols active in the game options, but the battlegroups still have the RTS symbols.
by hanspeter_schnitzel
Thu 17 Apr 2014 20:47
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Red Dragon is released - where are patchnotes?
Replies: 18
Views: 2867

Re: Red Dragon is released - where are patchnotes?

I want them, too. D: So I can see what units I have to switch, change, replace.
by hanspeter_schnitzel
Thu 17 Apr 2014 20:04
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: What was the reason behind updating FR and WGER armies?
Replies: 6
Views: 1099

Re: What was the reason behind updating FR and WGER armies?

They reduced the number from 12 to 5, I think, but did not reduce the content. I think the 12 campaings were rather short scenarios, but they summed those up into 5 proper campaigns with "the narrator" and immersive cut scences and starting videos and such things. Link! http://www.wargame-...
by hanspeter_schnitzel
Thu 17 Apr 2014 19:53
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: What was the reason behind updating FR and WGER armies?
Replies: 6
Views: 1099

Re: What was the reason behind updating FR and WGER armies?

Scandi and NWSP get their new shiny toys with a DLC. Also, I suppose WGER and FR will take part in the second Korea war scenario, when it is realeased. Also, FR and WGER are major nations since EE. NSWP and Scandi are minors, and NSWP first really plays a role since ALB.
by hanspeter_schnitzel
Thu 17 Apr 2014 19:19
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: No multiplayer campaign?
Replies: 51
Views: 7593

Re: No multiplayer campaign?

No.. no co-op? ;-; Can we at least play against someone at some point? D:
by hanspeter_schnitzel
Fri 11 Apr 2014 00:50
Forum: Modding
Topic: Infantry re-skins
Replies: 7
Views: 1682

Re: Infantry re-skins

I want a link to those reskins. :O
by hanspeter_schnitzel
Fri 4 Apr 2014 13:10
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Constructive criticism, game's timeline
Replies: 63
Views: 5087

Re: Constructive criticism, game's timeline

For the next Wargame (Hopefully there will be one! In a couple of years, prolly) they should use a more narrow timeframe, true. I mean, it's nice to have like 1200 units but, not nearly all of them are useful even. Or they could have time-frame decks in the next wargame (or maybe in this one, with a...
by hanspeter_schnitzel
Fri 4 Apr 2014 12:55
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: profile stats destroying much
Replies: 56
Views: 4836

Re: profile stats destroying much

There's a problem with kicking people who have bad W/L ratios. I mean, think about this: A new player comes to RD. Newb. So they go and play a buncha rounds. They play.. lets say... 30 games. Lose 25. They are not good at the game themselves yet and maybe their teammates were bad, too. So they decid...
by hanspeter_schnitzel
Fri 4 Apr 2014 12:37
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Question on NATO memberstate ingame
Replies: 35
Views: 3076

Re: Question on NATO memberstate ingame

But would lean more towards NATO in a conflict, I think.. right? I heard people say that as a reason why they are BLUFOR.
by hanspeter_schnitzel
Fri 4 Apr 2014 12:34
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Conquest or Destruction a matter of philosophy?
Replies: 30
Views: 3141

Re: Conquest or Destruction a matter of philosophy?

The problem with destruction is that it is also a take land and sit. :P Oh, wait, sit and artillery spam. In Destruction you have no reason to push at all as long as you have the point advantage. It's better to just scout out targets and then blow them up with artillery. Conquest doesn't punish you ...

Go to advanced search