Can we please get the NATO symbols for the battlegroups in the campaign? I have NATO symbols active in the game options, but the battlegroups still have the RTS symbols.

I want them, too. D: So I can see what units I have to switch, change, replace.

They reduced the number from 12 to 5, I think, but did not reduce the content. I think the 12 campaings were rather short scenarios, but they summed those up into 5 proper campaigns with "the narrator" and immersive cut scences and starting videos and such things. Link! http://www.wargame-...

Scandi and NWSP get their new shiny toys with a DLC. Also, I suppose WGER and FR will take part in the second Korea war scenario, when it is realeased. Also, FR and WGER are major nations since EE. NSWP and Scandi are minors, and NSWP first really plays a role since ALB.

No.. no co-op? ;-; Can we at least play against someone at some point? D:

I want a link to those reskins. :O

For the next Wargame (Hopefully there will be one! In a couple of years, prolly) they should use a more narrow timeframe, true. I mean, it's nice to have like 1200 units but, not nearly all of them are useful even. Or they could have time-frame decks in the next wargame (or maybe in this one, with a...

There's a problem with kicking people who have bad W/L ratios. I mean, think about this: A new player comes to RD. Newb. So they go and play a buncha rounds. They play.. lets say... 30 games. Lose 25. They are not good at the game themselves yet and maybe their teammates were bad, too. So they decid...

But would lean more towards NATO in a conflict, I think.. right? I heard people say that as a reason why they are BLUFOR.

The problem with destruction is that it is also a take land and sit. :P Oh, wait, sit and artillery spam. In Destruction you have no reason to push at all as long as you have the point advantage. It's better to just scout out targets and then blow them up with artillery. Conquest doesn't punish you ...