Search found 1660 matches

Go to advanced search

by terror51247
Fri 9 Dec 2016 03:40
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 41058

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

No I pulled the number out of my ass. Because LMAO at the prospect of a 30 AV tank in RD. That why i think that such vehicle should never appear in wargame. AP/AV both get compressed by the 30 hardcap. Modeling on this would probably cap it at 24 at beast, because 24 means it can survive the impact...
by terror51247
Fri 9 Dec 2016 03:04
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 41058

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

Guggy wrote:No I pulled the number out of my ass. Because LMAO at the prospect of a 30 AV tank in RD.

That why i think that such vehicle should never appear in wargame.
by terror51247
Fri 9 Dec 2016 02:15
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 41058

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

Guggy wrote:It'd get at most 26 FAV, I would think.

Did you calculate its area?
The turret is really really small while the hull is extremely strong with a 1000mm thick armor module and heavy ERA over it.
by terror51247
Fri 9 Dec 2016 01:53
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 41058

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

Oh, it surely wouldnt have 30 FAV then if the turret was more or less unarmored. Due to the unfortunate inability to differentiate between hull/turret armor, that'd drive the average armor down to something quite poor, probably :( Either way, the tank isnt relevant to the OP's thread, folks. Do you...
by terror51247
Fri 9 Dec 2016 00:04
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 41058

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

Oh, it surely wouldnt have 30 FAV then if the turret was more or less unarmored. Due to the unfortunate inability to differentiate between hull/turret armor, that'd drive the average armor down to something quite poor, probably :( Either way, the tank isnt relevant to the OP's thread, folks. Do you...
by terror51247
Thu 8 Dec 2016 23:55
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Rebalancing Yugoslavia
Replies: 349
Views: 20887

Re: Rebalancing Yugoslavia

- Smoke MLRS

I think that the other nations should have this.
by terror51247
Thu 8 Dec 2016 23:33
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 41058

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

Please elaborate on where I ever said that it was. You said one could destroy molot by shooting the gun many times.Thats not different at all. If that is true than it would have excessively average super heavy armor in game. http://i.imgur.com/hKOzmmX.jpg No, because its average protection isnt an ...
by terror51247
Thu 8 Dec 2016 11:41
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 41058

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

Molot's thin turret makes no difference. (Yes it does) You could put 800 mm of steel there and any hit by anything larger than a autocannon would still result in a firepower kill. (No, no it wouldn't) Not to mention that its turret is a tiny target. (Doesn't matter, it is still a big portion of the...
by terror51247
Thu 8 Dec 2016 05:09
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 41058

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

Believe it or not, but I have to agree with Gargean here, the 3BM-42 Project "Mango" has a penetration in accordance to the NATO standard of about 500-550mm RHA @ 2km. The earlier 3BM-32 Project "Vants" has about 550mm RHA penetration @ 2km, mostly as a result of it being a DU p...
by terror51247
Thu 8 Dec 2016 05:08
Forum: Wargame : Red Dragon
Topic: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!
Replies: 657
Views: 41058

Re: Make the USSR "Sufficient" Again!

Also, this. 30 AV is awfully optimistic. Not its not..... 1000 LOS in the hull.Its armor is made mostly by steel and ceramics.If those are the same ceramics you find on t80ud then you get 0.9 thickness efficiency so the tank's armor TE wont be smaller than 0.9 because the oly other component is ste...

Go to advanced search