Relatedly: surprised you didn't make the STRV 102 a reserve tank too. The STRV 102 is at the top end of the 15 point range so its vet is higher as an excuse to cut down on its availability for balancing reasons. It's basically a way to deal with the huge mass of chieftains in the Scandanavian low e...

As if games played meant anything. Games played is not a good indication of skill. Skill at the game does not make you good at balancing. No where else in the world would anyone say that skill and knowledge of a subject would give your opinion the same weight as the guy who doesn't. :!: :!: This bl...

Right now I think more than anything else there's too much AP available. I disagree entirely. I find the current deck system far too restrictive, and reducing Activation Points would only exacerbate the problem in my view. Cool picture though. I've long been a proponent of giving extra and more int...

New patch from Eugen did my head in, thought you guys had forgotten Scandis for a moment before I checked. Only one thing stood out to me: little nonplussed as to why you gave the M24 19/10, I thought it would be considered a reserve tank. Surely, if you were to choose, it would be this tank and no...

K1 get 4 cards: haven't seen any other tanks with 4 card availability, at least not yet. STRV 103C has four cards as well. The K1 is the only tank in all of blue dragons in that price range, while the other main coalitions nearly universally have more tanks in that price range. USSR and US are the ...

I kind of think it's useful at its price in a utility role like the Leclerc where it's not as good at heavy tank shootouts but in return has more utility against other vehicles. It's gonna lose to superheavies and it's a bit more vulnerable, but in return it has nice firepower for fighting a variety...

It not just tank vs tank, it is never like this a t80um lose to chally 2 not just because of armor, but accuracy too, and they have the same rof t72bu gets wrecked by chally 2 as once it gets panic and damaged, it is utterly useless besides, not a lot of tank engagement are on fields in maximum ran...

Luckily the game doesn't have such ridiculously lopsided tanks? And even then, that 23 AV tank would be vastly more durable than competitors and even if it hit once for every three hits the enemy got in, it would get a good shot at the first hit and do a lot of damage when it hit. It wouldn't have t...

That's a fair enough point. It seems like the main complaint is that you can send in a plane and take out a very high end tank without an equal risk, which of course leaves multiple options for resolving the problem. I personally tend towards increasing the risk because that rewards good combined ar...

Most of the AP 30 missile throwers, especially the double-tappers are painfully single target optimized as well, aren't they? The F-18C and the Su-27M will generally take out 3 targets in a single pass. Considering how expensive they are I don't see that as a problem. I could've sworn they throw tw...