If you don't mind me reminding: Belgium didn't exist at the time of Waterloo. It was a province of the Netherlands. Therefore, talks about the "freedom" of Belgium which could have hung in the balance of this battle are a bit ... off. Belgium was as occupied by the Netherlands then than t...

Mike wrote:

LoneRifle wrote:

ikalugin wrote:Except ericsdude aint around.

Vestly and Panzer are not either.

I miss Panzer He never failed to deliver

Not all permabans were good permabans

We know for certainty that countries in the world have not bribed FIFA. Nauru is a good example. As for football in the countries that make bids. Yes it's corrupt. The simple act of a player joining the association so that he can play on a professional level is fraudulent. I have absolutely no idea...

It is beyond rediculous and embarrassing that the French are upset about these coins.

Belgium wouldn't be the same Belgium had this battle gone differently. They want to celebrate not being French and who can blame them.

Um, can i get examples. I literally haven't been home to the US in a year, i've got pretty much no idea how things are going on over there. What's polarizing? How is she going further left? Like what policies is she pushing that make her unsuitable/suitable? I'm honest to god in the dark here. Well...

I genuinely think Qatar was just the straw that broke the camels back. I really think Russia in this instance has been unlucky to be caught up in it. They obviously bribed to win the World Cup but so did France and South Africa that we know of so far. The problem is Qatar won when In all reason they...

If anyone wants to add a friend for in game. Mad22 is my name on game.

Please add guys.

The decision to host the World Cup in the USA in 1994 was decided in 1988. So you would need to go back to probably 84 for a good investigation into fraud regarding host of that World Cup. That's a long time ago to find evidence. But I assume you weren't interested in the reason and just wanted to s...

Be prepared for bluster, lots of talking and no Real changes

ikalugin wrote:Wasn't the destroyer trying to violate the Crimean territorial waters?

I'm gonna turn that back on you ikalugin. Do you really think it would be trying to breach territorial waters? Does that sound even slightly likely? Really?