Search found 2744 matches

Go to advanced search

by raventhefuhrer
Thu 9 Mar 2017 22:34
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: Phases in SD
Replies: 66
Views: 6001

Re: Phases in SD

They definitely need to find some way to get control of 10v10s. The quality of the gameplay is demonstrably less than the smaller game scenarios, but many people prefer 10v10s because they're easier to fill up and are maybe less pressure. But the end effect is that Wargame, which should be a deep an...
by raventhefuhrer
Thu 9 Mar 2017 20:12
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: Map Size - Is this a 4v4 or a 10v10?
Replies: 16
Views: 1501

Re: Map Size - Is this a 4v4 or a 10v10?

From a horizontal standpoint you can get some idea of how much 'frontage' a player will get if you know the map-size. If it's a 10v10 the scale must be quite smaller than Wargame, whereas if it's a 4v4 it's only a bit smaller maybe.
by raventhefuhrer
Thu 9 Mar 2017 20:00
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: Map Size - Is this a 4v4 or a 10v10?
Replies: 16
Views: 1501

Map Size - Is this a 4v4 or a 10v10?

http://www.warlegend.net/wp-content/uploads/Steel_Division_Normandy_44_Screenshot_02.jpg Take a look at the screenshot above. The map itself looks absolutely amazing from both a visual and a gameplay standpoint. There's open spaces, tons of cover, and many small villages/crossroads to fight over. Re...
by raventhefuhrer
Thu 9 Mar 2017 06:16
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: Division Designing/Editing
Replies: 29
Views: 3108

Re: Division Designing/Editing

He said some divisions will have access to units and capabilities outside of their standard TO&E. For example, I know a Panzergrenadier Division (the 17th SS) at Normandy had a Fallschirmjager regiment attached to it during the campaign. Perhaps if the 17th SS were in the game that would mean th...
by raventhefuhrer
Thu 9 Mar 2017 03:35
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: Division Designing/Editing
Replies: 29
Views: 3108

Re: Division Designing/Editing

The way I understand it is that you must choose a division to play as, and then you build a deck out of units available to that division. So if you're playing a 101st Airborne deck, you could theoretically change your deck to include more anti-tank assets, but only things that would have been availa...
by raventhefuhrer
Wed 8 Mar 2017 21:36
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: Phases in SD
Replies: 66
Views: 6001

Re: Phases in SD

Excellent :D
by raventhefuhrer
Wed 8 Mar 2017 20:00
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: The New CV System
Replies: 8
Views: 1065

Re: The New CV System

It will depend how susceptible tanks are to morale damage, suppression, etc.
by raventhefuhrer
Wed 8 Mar 2017 19:07
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: Phases in SD
Replies: 66
Views: 6001

Re: Phases in SD

If you add in the ability to create a bunch of restrictions and adjustments to settings, you are going to create a bunch of lobbies that go way off into the deep end for cheese. I'm not sure if you meant to disagree or agree with me, Orcbuster, etc. But I basically feel the same way. Wargame suffer...
by raventhefuhrer
Wed 8 Mar 2017 18:14
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: Some Screenshots
Replies: 35
Views: 3665

Re: Some Screenshots

Yeah, no one can accuse Topskin of promoting his clan.
by raventhefuhrer
Wed 8 Mar 2017 17:41
Forum: General Discussions
Topic: New anti-armor system ?
Replies: 56
Views: 5083

Re: New anti-armor system ?

I hope they put a lot of testing and thought into the new system of stressing/panicking/surrendering and so forth. If the mechanic is implemented only to a reasonable degree, and is predictable, I think it could add a lot to the game and allow more asymmetrical engagements - i.e. you don't need a he...

Go to advanced search