Search found 152 matches

Go to advanced search

by Scharnberg
Sun 4 Aug 2013 23:06
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Underrated and Overrated
Replies: 210
Views: 14431

Re: Underrated and Overrated

Cheap tanks are underrated. I'm also not sure if this is still the case, but Anti-air helicopters were always underrated. I find them supremely useful for chasing off/destroying enemy recon helicopters and providing extremely mobile AA cover for defenses that are necessarily spread (and I can't nec...
by Scharnberg
Sun 4 Aug 2013 22:51
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Underrated and Overrated
Replies: 210
Views: 14431

Re: Underrated and Overrated

Underrated: USSR/PACT: T-62M-1 - only 70 points for a range 2800m, 19 ap ATGM, can kill anything in its prince range and do serious dmg to M1A1 Abrams. and 1 point to Leopard 2a4s and challengers. and it has enough armor to take 2-3 hits, meaning you have time to retreat with it. Take it as a vetera...
by Scharnberg
Sun 28 Jul 2013 20:37
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Cobra spam is unstoppable
Replies: 40
Views: 2201

Re: Cobra spam is officially unstoppable

I dont understand why Euegen dont just fixs it by making the starting deployment points alot lower. That way not only heli spam would be fixed but also the the heavy tank meta as you would need to use atgm inf and low-mid tier tanks to hold every front. That way helicopters and heavy tanks would fir...
by Scharnberg
Sun 7 Jul 2013 15:08
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: Current Tank meta AKA boring Heavy Metal
Replies: 58
Views: 3344

Re: Current Tank meta AKA boring Heavy Metal

There is one mistake in your logic. Okay lets say we changed the avability of all high tier tanks to 2x2. Then let me see i would then take 2 cards of Leopard 2a4s and 1 card of Challengers = 6 tanks - How often do you end up fielding more than 6 heavyies any way. And other mistake in your logic is ...
by Scharnberg
Sun 7 Jul 2013 12:32
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: the balance
Replies: 85
Views: 4636

Re: the balance

I'll just leave this here for people claiming PACT has better helos, arty, infantry, etc.: http://wargame-ee.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=32510 I do have to say obr.1986 is good though. Try it guys, low ammo and vulnerability are the only problems. But now that T80A has been removed not like ...
by Scharnberg
Sun 7 Jul 2013 02:35
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: the balance
Replies: 85
Views: 4636

Re: the balance

But yea NATO is better at doing a frontal assult. But USSR is alot better at flanking because of higher range.
by Scharnberg
Sun 7 Jul 2013 02:33
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: the balance
Replies: 85
Views: 4636

Re: the balance

seen it twice i think xD
by Scharnberg
Sun 7 Jul 2013 02:30
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: the balance
Replies: 85
Views: 4636

Re: the balance

Also all of USSRs ground ATGMS on tanks, infantrys, vehicles outrange every NATO ground ATGMs. USSR also has the infamous BMPT stunlocker vehicle, which is god dam bad ass. USSR also has the best artillery, which means if you feel like attacking you can do alot of status dmg rendering Nato tanks clo...
by Scharnberg
Sun 7 Jul 2013 01:49
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: the balance
Replies: 85
Views: 4636

Re: the balance

Good job of actually responding to my arguments, instead of just waffling on about other things without even bothering to support your statements. It's funny how people are actually taking the time out to try and write meaningful responses to this neverending stream of nonsense you call posts. Typi...
by Scharnberg
Sun 7 Jul 2013 00:04
Forum: Wargame : AirLand Battle
Topic: the balance
Replies: 85
Views: 4636

Re: the balance

Anyone expecting ATGMs in general to reliably deal with heavies in quantity is playing the wrong game. No that one is just playing NATO. What you seem to forget is that nearly ever god dam PACT tank have ATGMS while nearly none of nato tanks have ATGMS and thoese 3 who have do 16 AP. That means if ...

Go to advanced search

cron