Pictures for signatures!

User avatar
realfakealex
Lieutenant
Posts: 1245
Joined: Mon 18 Feb 2013 11:59
Location: Kerbin
Contact:

Re: Pictures for signatures!

Postby realfakealex » Wed 11 Dec 2013 00:12

kiheerSEDMAN wrote:Tell me, is that font intentional?


Indeed, it is very intentional my little SEDMAN. :twisted:

User avatar
KattiValk
General
Posts: 6278
Joined: Tue 19 Nov 2013 03:39
Location: Houston, Texas (CST)
Contact:

Re: Pictures for signatures!

Postby KattiValk » Wed 11 Dec 2013 00:17

realfakealex wrote:
kiheerSEDMAN wrote:Tell me, is that font intentional?


Indeed, it is very intentional my little SEDMAN. :twisted:

+1

Love the minimalistic look.

User avatar
realfakealex
Lieutenant
Posts: 1245
Joined: Mon 18 Feb 2013 11:59
Location: Kerbin
Contact:

Re: Pictures for signatures!

Postby realfakealex » Wed 11 Dec 2013 01:53

I actually spent more time looking for a better picture for my little burritos than putting it in the sig... ended up taking 20 more pictures in order to find a better one...

but none was better :lol:

It was either that or good ol' Challengers

User avatar
KattiValk
General
Posts: 6278
Joined: Tue 19 Nov 2013 03:39
Location: Houston, Texas (CST)
Contact:

Re: Pictures for signatures!

Postby KattiValk » Wed 11 Dec 2013 04:56

realfakealex wrote:I actually spent more time looking for a better picture for my little burritos than putting it in the sig... ended up taking 20 more pictures in order to find a better one...

but none was better :lol:

It was either that or good ol' Challengers

That sure is a lot of burritos, sure to give the enemy a serious case of highly flammable gas.

User avatar
realfakealex
Lieutenant
Posts: 1245
Joined: Mon 18 Feb 2013 11:59
Location: Kerbin
Contact:

Re: Pictures for signatures!

Postby realfakealex » Wed 11 Dec 2013 21:57

kiheerSEDMAN wrote:
realfakealex wrote:I actually spent more time looking for a better picture for my little burritos than putting it in the sig... ended up taking 20 more pictures in order to find a better one...

but none was better :lol:

It was either that or good ol' Challengers

That sure is a lot of burritos, sure to give the enemy a serious case of highly flammable gas.


I'm not so sure!!

User avatar
Graphic
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 10587
Joined: Mon 30 Apr 2012 10:18
Location: Battle Born
Contact:

Re: Pictures for signatures!

Postby Graphic » Thu 12 Dec 2013 01:36

This should do for a while. :P

Thanks again for the .psd, Porn Master.
k

User avatar
KattiValk
General
Posts: 6278
Joined: Tue 19 Nov 2013 03:39
Location: Houston, Texas (CST)
Contact:

Re: Pictures for signatures!

Postby KattiValk » Thu 12 Dec 2013 02:49

realfakealex wrote:
kiheerSEDMAN wrote:
realfakealex wrote:I actually spent more time looking for a better picture for my little burritos than putting it in the sig... ended up taking 20 more pictures in order to find a better one...

but none was better :lol:

It was either that or good ol' Challengers

That sure is a lot of burritos, sure to give the enemy a serious case of highly flammable gas.


I'm not so sure!!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Well that's not overreacting.

"Sir we have spotted an enemy supply vehicle!"
Spoiler : :
Image

User avatar
trotskygrad
General
Posts: 6444
Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2012 16:09
Location: две тысячи лет война
Contact:

Re: Pictures for signatures!

Postby trotskygrad » Thu 12 Dec 2013 04:01

kiheerSEDMAN wrote:
realfakealex wrote:
kiheerSEDMAN wrote:Tell me, is that font intentional?


Indeed, it is very intentional my little SEDMAN. :twisted:

+1

Love the minimalistic look.


it's not minimalistic at all. Stop misusing the term.
NEXT TIME I SEE A DAMN FLAMEWAR INVOLVING DARTH-LAMPSHADE, FROSTPOOKY, LONERIFLE, FADE2GRAY, TROTSKYGRAD AND/OR ANYONE INVOLVED IN A DISCUSSION BETWEEN THEM I'M GOING TO HAND OUT BANS TO ANYONE USING ANYTHING LOOKING REMOTELY LIKE AN AD-HOMINEM

User avatar
KattiValk
General
Posts: 6278
Joined: Tue 19 Nov 2013 03:39
Location: Houston, Texas (CST)
Contact:

Re: Pictures for signatures!

Postby KattiValk » Thu 12 Dec 2013 04:02

trotskygrad wrote:
kiheerSEDMAN wrote:
realfakealex wrote:Indeed, it is very intentional my little SEDMAN. :twisted:

+1

Love the minimalistic look.


it's not minimalistic at all. Stop misusing the term.

Calm down, I meant the font not the entire sig.

User avatar
realfakealex
Lieutenant
Posts: 1245
Joined: Mon 18 Feb 2013 11:59
Location: Kerbin
Contact:

Re: Pictures for signatures!

Postby realfakealex » Thu 12 Dec 2013 17:18

kiheerSEDMAN wrote:
realfakealex wrote:
I'm not so sure!!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Well that's not overreacting.

"Sir we have spotted an enemy supply vehicle!"
Spoiler : :
Image


Well... I think it's safe to say 315 rockets per Burrito is never too much.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests