Markenzwieback wrote:D-M wrote:https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160926/1045706456/us-airstrike-daesh-army.html

Markenzwieback wrote:D-M wrote:https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160926/1045706456/us-airstrike-daesh-army.html
delfo wrote:Doinize wrote:D-M wrote:https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160926/1045706456/us-airstrike-daesh-army.html
i really want some of the shit these "journalists" are on...
Most banks have Rubles, and firing ranges have Makarovs, pressing them to the back of your skull would cause some issues though.
Sounds good enough maybe you only score soft kills like optics and tracks so it should be aided by somthing elles to finish those off and i guess the bm21 is getting old. But yea i wouldent want to be in a tank or bmp1 getting hit by bm21s if i where i would surley button up and then if im lucky enough only the optics get blown up and there is no tank or stmg close by to kill me but i would have to go back to be repaired.delfo wrote:zebtucker wrote:delfo wrote:https://twitter.com/ajplus/status/780271191634305024
This is the humanity that contrasts Assad and Russia's genocide and lies. Coming from the media that was the favourite mailing destination of Osama Bin Laden...
The world is a weird place.
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1335977/thumb ... -570.jpg?6
Maybe you should read other media also then and not be so onesided
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1335982/thumb ... -570.jpg?1
Asma Al Assad when not ordering her personal bodyguards to do ethnic cleansing in Damascus and doing photo shoots for RT and Abkhazia's news network.
Now what are your views on BM 21s and their ability to stop armored columns ? Given your new profile pic.
Here read about Asma who very much approves of her husband's approach.
http://europe.newsweek.com/joan-juliet- ... 5615?rm=eu
47andrej wrote: Are you implying russian state news agency (ex-RIA) editors needs to be bribed or even threatened to retranslate some report from syrian goverment?
47andrej wrote:Are you ok? Your reply is strange and confusing. Are you implying russian state news agency (ex-RIA) editors needs to be bribed or even threatened to retranslate some report from syrian goverment?
I mean its your usual, lets say, slightly anti-russian attitude but thats sounds very confusing.
D-M wrote:47andrej wrote: Are you implying russian state news agency (ex-RIA) editors needs to be bribed or even threatened to retranslate some report from syrian goverment?
You are right, they don't, spitting propaganda is a second nature for them they are probably doing it for free.
47andrej wrote:D-M wrote:47andrej wrote: Are you implying russian state news agency (ex-RIA) editors needs to be bribed or even threatened to retranslate some report from syrian goverment?
You are right, they don't, spitting propaganda is a second nature for them they are probably doing it for free.
Did syrian goverment not made this statement? So how can this be considered lies from russian media? There has been a lot more news in western media from syrian rebel "sources" which where totally nuts and joke. Also this statement doesnt need necessarily false: west has a long tradition to support inhuman scum like Pol Pot, Taliban, IS and other islamists when it goes against geopolitical enemy. Sometimes it kicks back.
So could it be indirect support for IS? Possibly, 100 soldiers dead and more wounded in surrounded DZ are pretty big deal, could turn the tide for IS. If SAA would loose DZ they werent present in East at all. So US and friends could deny existence of syrian state even more often.
Western media has somewhat firm grip on its public, outright staged shit from Al Jazeera, BBC dont even upset anyone. RT is just drop in the bucket.
Assad being innocent angel? No. "Moderate" rebels? Literally cutthroats.
Yakhont wrote:The CoH agreement has been released by US and Russia. Here is the english version
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/262413.pdf
From the agrrement it seems to put a lot of pressure on the US to influence the various rebel groups to disassociate with the hardline Islamist groups. But those groups are the most effective in combat so the rebels are not incentives to do so.
https://imgur.com/a/Fuhvh
The siege of Aleppo is continuing and the Assad aligned forces are making some progress. I think unless the rebel groups are able to relive the siege they would weaken their strategic position seriously. They don't really have anywhere to go if they fall in Aleppo; Idllib is the only major region left with e Southern Front being very limited in their movement.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests