ikalugin wrote:Hence why I say that the Kharkiv desighn differed significantly from other Soviet (291/292), US (TTB/CATTB/block 3) and Russian (195/640) desighns in terms of layout.
Armata being derived from the 195 also differs from the Kharkiv desighn.
As the new SPG was mentioned, did I by any chance mention it's new capabilities? Is anyone interested in those?
nope, you didnt mention it, sad it isnt double gun
Iveliar wrote:another505 wrote:also, why the transition from 12.7 to 7.62 anti aircraft mg ?
How far I know T-15 Armata and Kurganets-25 now use a weapon-module from APS-Bumerang because their own modules with heavier weapon - 57mm or 40mm guns - still in development. Really our military puts this modules from APS on another stuff for test a electronic systems, which will be same on every type of weapon-module, like fire-control-system, AI-elemets, ets.
well, im talking about the T-14 tank, i doubt you will place a 57mm gun on it lol