Every Inch counts?... Big guns

User avatar
James-Bond
Master Sergeant
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon 9 Jul 2012 18:08
Contact:

Every Inch counts?... Big guns

Postby James-Bond » Fri 6 Apr 2018 00:51

Excuse the terrible title humour
But does size really matter?

Main Question:
A. Bullpup vs conventional layout, does size matter that much?
B. Is the performance in size saved in bullpup make much of a difference?

So coming from a place where i dont have access to a firing range so Im an atmchair general.
(If I'm wrong about anything correct me)

So looking at it from at extremely simplified view
Barrel and ammo determine performance to hit a target.
In automatics exhaust? Handling mechanisms , effects rate of fire
Everything else is ergonomics for the shooter?

I imagine I haven't factored in other variables like
Design considerations, ease of production, cost.
Attachments
main-qimg-30f3c92632c90e6a1afac38298bd3a8a-c.jpg
main-qimg-30f3c92632c90e6a1afac38298bd3a8a-c.jpg (55.07 KiB) Viewed 338 times
svd_and_svu_comparison_by_super6_4-d4wxtvj.jpg
svd_and_svu_comparison_by_super6_4-d4wxtvj.jpg (44.35 KiB) Viewed 338 times

Sigirdiwarth
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 507
Joined: Mon 5 Jan 2015 12:08
Contact:

Re: Every Inch counts?... Big guns

Postby Sigirdiwarth » Sat 7 Apr 2018 16:50

Pros:
Reduced length makes the rifles easier to transport when mounted in a vehicle (problem usually solved with the use of folding stocks) and less likely to hit obstructions in buidlings.
The center of mass of the rifle very close to the grip makes it easier to hold it on target for extended periods of time at the expense of increased muzzle climb when fired.

Cons:
Increased complexity of manufacture.
The trigger is spongy and the ejection port makes it uncomfortable to shoot left-handed, though those are engineering problems specific to individual designs.
Image

User avatar
Shrike
Lieutenant General
Posts: 4501
Joined: Sun 22 Sep 2013 04:30
Location: Central California, US
Contact:

Re: Every Inch counts?... Big guns

Postby Shrike » Sun 8 Apr 2018 08:40

I remember somewhere on Forgotten Weapons where Ian said the Bullpup concept was kind of dated since with modern conventional rifles you can get similar benefits of a bullpup by altering barrel rotation maker shorter barrels more viable.

Also not that many countries seem interested in bullpups anymore as AR pattern rifles like the M4 and HK416 become more common.

User avatar
Grabbed_by_the_Spets
General
Posts: 6552
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2012 11:40
Contact:

Re: Every Inch counts?... Big guns

Postby Grabbed_by_the_Spets » Mon 9 Apr 2018 04:13

Shrike wrote:Also not that many countries seem interested in bullpups anymore as AR pattern rifles like the M4 and HK416 become more common.


Don't know about that, there are still a butt-ton of countries that still use bullpups.
Image

User avatar
Killertomato
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon 9 Jul 2012 02:46
Contact:

Re: Every Inch counts?... Big guns

Postby Killertomato » Mon 9 Apr 2018 06:46

Grabbed_by_the_Spets wrote:
Shrike wrote:Also not that many countries seem interested in bullpups anymore as AR pattern rifles like the M4 and HK416 become more common.


Don't know about that, there are still a butt-ton of countries that still use bullpups.


Yeah but there's no mass movement towards bullpups like there was 20-30 years ago. The last country to go conventional -> bullpup was Israel with Tavor. Since then NZ and now France have gone back to conventional.

Personally, I prefer regular rifles, but that's just what I have (waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay) more experience with.
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?

User avatar
Grabbed_by_the_Spets
General
Posts: 6552
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2012 11:40
Contact:

Re: Every Inch counts?... Big guns

Postby Grabbed_by_the_Spets » Mon 9 Apr 2018 07:06

Killertomato wrote:
Grabbed_by_the_Spets wrote:
Shrike wrote:Also not that many countries seem interested in bullpups anymore as AR pattern rifles like the M4 and HK416 become more common.


Don't know about that, there are still a butt-ton of countries that still use bullpups.


Yeah but there's no mass movement towards bullpups like there was 20-30 years ago. The last country to go conventional -> bullpup was Israel with Tavor. Since then NZ and now France have gone back to conventional.


Well, that's because the mass conversion has already happened, so there would have to be a conversion back if that wish to convert again.

Besides NZ, Malaysia and France. All other countries using bullpups are sticking to bullpups.
Image

User avatar
Fade2Gray
General
Posts: 8655
Joined: Wed 1 May 2013 23:30
Location: IED proof in Iraq
Contact:

Re: Every Inch counts?... Big guns

Postby Fade2Gray » Tue 10 Apr 2018 02:05

Bullpups cause more problems than they fix. Your typical AR you can do some wild battlefield hotfixes with if needs must. With bullpups you are far more likely to have a full stop fault that totally deadlines the weapon and needs a dedicated armorer to fix.
Image
Image
Think you have what it takes to enlist into the military? You sure about that?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests