ikalugin wrote:So no group sizes? I am disapointed with M16A2 supporters.
That's a very, very limiting constraint and wouldn't particularly show you the strengths or weaknesses of either weapon. I'm not saying that's to be immediately discounted, but it's not really going to get you that far as it's entirely, entirely, entirely dependent on the rifle's set up, maintenance, and the tightness that the armorer put them together. Small arms are not a science, ikalugin, they are an art; ballistics is where you're allowed to be crude and handle numbers, in the actual firearms themselves, until you're talking match quality pieces, you're quite simply taking into account too many variables for the data to be worthwhile. If you want to compare the weapons in the manner you're doing, you two should stick to what can actually be number-crunched.
Soundwolf776 wrote:AK penetrates a railroad track. Lengthwise.
AK vs M16 thread - so much nostalgia.
The obviously superior weapon is the M14.