Two abrams beat a T80 with little damage. Because a T80 beats a brams in a 1v1, doesn't mean that in a 2v1 one of the abrams will be dead.
johnsushant wrote:DeuZerre wrote:I don't really understand the whole "attacking always costs more than defending" everyone is talking about.
Attacking IS always costlier than defending. This has been explained time and again and it is absolutely right for it to be so. Even the last game by EUGEN had the system where a 35$ AT would fight 60$ tanks with ease. The point is that in every game there exists an incentive to attack instead of defend. In RUSE one needs to go out on the offensive to get funds and also pushing the enemy to his base makes you very immune from the enemy arty.
In this game there is absolutely no reason to attack simply because it IS NOT worth it.
Because you shouldn't go attacking a strong defence without an overwhelmingly strong force yourself.