One Deck to fight them all

User avatar
Fade2Gray
General
Posts: 8654
Joined: Wed 1 May 2013 23:30
Location: IED proof in Iraq
Contact:

Re: One Deck to fight them all

Postby Fade2Gray » Fri 12 Jan 2018 19:05

HrcAk47 wrote:Care for a 1v1 so you can try out your deck in a non-special-needs gamemode?

This was so savage that even though it wasn't aimed at me? My feelings are still hurt.

Image

VCG-001 USS Spain wrote:So I found a map you could turtle on, and really prepare, and get ready to execute attacks and efficiently destroy things. I found STTP. And I efficiently and quickly attack after a proper buildup.

You can build up quickly on high income? Really? What a shocker.

This is literally Seton's Clutch no air no naval 30 min NR, or in other words....

Image

VCG-001 USS Spain wrote:I suppose I could play tactical... but I prefer playing as much of the game as I can at a time. In normal matches before I played STTP "cancerfests" with my friends, I always had fun, but, it felt like I could never reach any true potential.

Translation? "I was getting owned hard, but in this noobfest I'm able to actually get a positive score for once."
Image
Image
Think you have what it takes to enlist into the military? You sure about that?

Fodder
Sergeant Major
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri 7 Oct 2016 20:15
Contact:

Re: One Deck to fight them all

Postby Fodder » Sat 13 Jan 2018 03:04

Fade2Gray wrote:?

HrcAk47 wrote:?

I dont know why your giving him a hard time? he's obviously new and doesnt know what a competitive deck is, you can tell by his 12 posts....
Not to mention this thread is about your favorite deck.

XanderTuron
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 591
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2016 23:17
Contact:

Re: One Deck to fight them all

Postby XanderTuron » Sat 13 Jan 2018 03:44

Fodder wrote:I dont know why your giving him a hard time? he's obviously new and doesnt know what a competitive deck is, you can tell by his 12 posts....
Not to mention this thread is about your favorite deck.

Actually, this thread is also about good multi-purpose decks, which often tend to be favourites of the playerbase; the reason why there is the mocking going on is because they posted a very situational deck intended exclusively for one thing.
My mouth is moving, but nothing relevant is coming out. Also I cannot guarantee that my research is perfect or even remotely accurate.

I have low quality Wargame Red Dragon casts on my youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/XanderTuron

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: One Deck to fight them all

Postby HrcAk47 » Sat 13 Jan 2018 04:35

Tbh I don't care which decks he uses and in which game mode, de gustibus non est disputandum. He just used the words "you can't" too much, which made me interested... can I not, really.

So if he's game, I'm game.
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

VCG-001 USS Spain
Specialist
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2017 12:08
Contact:

Re: One Deck to fight them all

Postby VCG-001 USS Spain » Fri 19 Jan 2018 22:13

Fodder wrote:
Fade2Gray wrote:?

HrcAk47 wrote:?

I dont know why your giving him a hard time? he's obviously new and doesnt know what a competitive deck is, you can tell by his 12 posts....
Not to mention this thread is about your favorite deck.


I'm not new to the game, only the competitive side which is filled with arrogant a$$holes. I have 2090 hours, but this is my first game in the series. I am fully acquainted with the game's mechanics, and have simply never felt the desire to fight on a scale that small. I honestly could not care less about the outcome of a game that small. When I feel like gaming for about 30 minutes, I go play War Thunder. But when I have a proper, good amount of time I hop on Wargame, and play a long, high stakes match. The only stakes in this game are the time you invest in a single match, and so when I play with 2-3 of my friends against other humans and have a 5 hour ordeal and narrowly win because the enemy surrendered, it's awesome. The fighting is awesome, the management of forces en masse efficiently at the tactical level is awesome, and I love it.

But in the eyes of these brainless retards, you can only play the game one way, and it is their way. I'm sorry for trying to enjoy the game.

User avatar
Fade2Gray
General
Posts: 8654
Joined: Wed 1 May 2013 23:30
Location: IED proof in Iraq
Contact:

Re: One Deck to fight them all

Postby Fade2Gray » Sat 20 Jan 2018 02:40

VCG-001 USS Spain wrote:I'm not new to the game, only the competitive side which is filled with arrogant a$$holes.

You make some straight up ridic claims, and your only response to those who called you out are to call them assholes? Well then, can't say I'm surprised.

I have 2090 hours, but this is my first game in the series.

That is precious, I have 2069 hours in WG:RD alone. Not exactly something to brag about on my behalf, but it goes to show just how much of a gulf in experience there is between you and me, and I'm not exactly all that good to begin with.

I am fully acquainted with the game's mechanics

No you are not.

But when I have a proper, good amount of time I hop on Wargame, and play a long, high stakes match.

Seton's Clutch turtling cancer fests are your definition of "high stakes"...? Interesting, that's my definition of low stakes newbie game.

The only stakes in this game are the time you invest in a single match, and so when I play with 2-3 of my friends against other humans and have a 5 hour ordeal and narrowly win because the enemy surrendered, it's awesome. The fighting is awesome, the management of forces en masse efficiently at the tactical level is awesome, and I love it.

Matches determined by arty spam on choke points are the most dull and boring games there are. Seton's Clutch is by far the least "tactical" map to play on, especially when you are counting on your friends to carry you. That's all support decks are good for, being carried by friends in a match of low skill players so you can sit there and turtle without any pressure or worry. Play with a couple friends on Meme Ridge or DDay or 2v2 Paddy with a support deck against me and some half decent players and let me know how it works for you.

But in the eyes of these brainless retards, you can only play the game one way, and it is their way. I'm sorry for trying to enjoy the game.

Everyone who calls you out for your straight up ridic claims = retards.

k
Image
Image
Think you have what it takes to enlist into the military? You sure about that?

XanderTuron
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 591
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2016 23:17
Contact:

Re: One Deck to fight them all

Postby XanderTuron » Sun 21 Jan 2018 08:19

VCG-001 USS Spain wrote:I am fully acquainted with the game's mechanics...

Well in that case, these questions should be no trouble for you.
  1. What is the significance of 1 vs 2 armour?
  2. What is the formula for determining how much damage a KE attack will do to a given armour value?
  3. How much AP (KE and HEAT) does it take to kill a 10 HP vehicle with 0,1, and 2 armour respectively?
  4. How does accuracy/range scaling work?
  5. What advantage do KE projectiles have over HEAT projectiles?
  6. How do ATGM "re-rolls" work?
  7. What is the significance of 6 vs 7 HE missiles in terms of air defence?
  8. What is the significance of 3 vs 4 top armour?
  9. Why is the AS-90 generally considered to be superior to the M109A6 Paladin in game?
  10. Why is the M110/M110A2 generally considered to be superior to the 2S7 Pion and 2S7M Malka in game?
  11. What is the damage reduction that infantry receive in forests and building blocks respectively?
  12. How does Close Quarters Combat (CQC, which occurs when infantry fight other infantry that are in the same building block as them) effect battle rifles in game?
  13. How does CQC effect sub machine guns?
My mouth is moving, but nothing relevant is coming out. Also I cannot guarantee that my research is perfect or even remotely accurate.

I have low quality Wargame Red Dragon casts on my youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/XanderTuron

urogard
Brigadier
Posts: 3055
Joined: Sun 4 May 2014 13:31
Contact:

Re: One Deck to fight them all

Postby urogard » Sun 21 Jan 2018 13:10

I've got a serious question to all authors of the last 12 or so posts.
Did you feel with any one of your posts, that that's the post that's going to persuade "the other side" to see the "truth" and change their opinion? Or are you just writing stuff because you want them to read it?

User avatar
FrangibleCover
Lieutenant
Posts: 1452
Joined: Mon 14 Nov 2016 21:34
Contact:

Re: One Deck to fight them all

Postby FrangibleCover » Mon 22 Jan 2018 12:47

urogard wrote:I've got a serious question to all authors of the last 12 or so posts.
Did you feel with any one of your posts, that that's the post that's going to persuade "the other side" to see the "truth" and change their opinion? Or are you just writing stuff because you want them to read it?

Have you ever been in an internet argument?

On second thoughts, don't actually answer that question, I just want you to read it.
What if Wargame stuck to timeframe?
Image

User avatar
Fade2Gray
General
Posts: 8654
Joined: Wed 1 May 2013 23:30
Location: IED proof in Iraq
Contact:

Re: One Deck to fight them all

Postby Fade2Gray » Tue 23 Jan 2018 14:22

FrangibleCover wrote:
urogard wrote:I've got a serious question to all authors of the last 12 or so posts.
Did you feel with any one of your posts, that that's the post that's going to persuade "the other side" to see the "truth" and change their opinion? Or are you just writing stuff because you want them to read it?

Have you ever been in an internet argument?

On second thoughts, don't actually answer that question, I just want you to read it.

How are you going to read it if he doesn't answer it? O_o
Image
Image
Think you have what it takes to enlist into the military? You sure about that?

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests