Wargame Sequel, Wargame 4, Next Wargame, Expansion Directory

thenosh
Lieutenant
Posts: 1466
Joined: Wed 11 Sep 2013 19:32
Contact:

Re: Wargame Sequel, Wargame 4, Next Wargame, Expansion Directory

Postby thenosh » Tue 5 Oct 2021 12:58

Sonki3 wrote:I presume it is more likely that we will get a Steel Division 3: Cold War ... which is basically Steel Division 2 with a lot of elements of Wargame: Red Dragon with quite a lot of updates and more features.


I really hope they don't make the same mistakes they did in Steel Division to a possible wargame 4. I really do. And I bet you that if they made an 1 to 1 WWII adaptation of Wargame Red Dragon, they'd ended up with much more players than they did with the two Steel Divisions. Seeing what AoA and SD became, I really hope they learned from that and go back to a bricks and mortar Wargame if they do a 4.
"Where is my T-80UK CV with top mounted BUK-M1?"

-Wargame global chat, somewhen somewhere-

tergo90
Private
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue 21 Nov 2017 22:27
Contact:

Re: Wargame Sequel, Wargame 4, Next Wargame, Expansion Directory

Postby tergo90 » Wed 20 Oct 2021 11:33

IF I HAVE SOME PROPOSITIONs TO IMPROVE THE NEXT GAME IT WILL BE :
-field artillery
-parachute infantry
-more big maps
-realistic recovery vehicle + medical ambulance or armored medvac
- big city area and more realistic infantry garrison
- improve infantry fighting gameplay
-add mine and naval mine
-reconnaissance aircraft to see land units
-military buildings (command , radar ,airfield , barracks .....)

Ck1o1
Corporal
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat 20 Dec 2014 22:47
Contact:

Re: Wargame Sequel, Wargame 4, Next Wargame, Expansion Directory

Postby Ck1o1 » Tue 26 Oct 2021 20:28

Will something come with modern warfare? It's not like I hate WW2 but I hate it...^^

urogard
Brigadier
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sun 4 May 2014 13:31
Contact:

Re: Wargame Sequel, Wargame 4, Next Wargame, Expansion Directory

Postby urogard » Sun 31 Oct 2021 14:21

tergo90 wrote:IF I HAVE SOME PROPOSITIONs TO IMPROVE THE NEXT GAME IT WILL BE :
-field artillery
-parachute infantry
-realistic recovery vehicle + medical ambulance or armored medvac
-add mine and naval mine
-military buildings (command , radar ,airfield , barracks .....)

Wargame is a tactical, not a strategic game.
Paradrops and other strategic level assets/concepts have been repeatedly denied, and they have rightfully no place in this game.
viewtopic.php?f=155&t=52309
EInarial wrote:The List of Do Not Ask Will Not Happens
Pulled shamelessly from the directory post. One line denials to so many posts of late.
Bolded particularly frequent / persistent requests.
1. No Paradrops;
[EUG]MadMat wrote:So no: paradrops will remain, as in real life, a strategic option, not a tactical one.

...
6. Engineering Equipment/Mines, Trenches, Emplacements, Camo Nets, or etc;
...


tergo90 wrote:- reconnaissance aircraft to see land units

Will never happen
viewtopic.php?f=91&t=28384&p=203471#p203471
Xeno426 wrote:
Yori wrote:Recon by Air has a long tradition.

There are no recon planes ingame. Why?

Balance issues. They didn't want people sniping command vehicles in the first minute of the game.

Besides, air recon at the time was more strategic in nature. It would take at least an hour or more for information to be relayed to commanders in the field. Helicopters filled the roll of recon quite well.

I do wish there were spotter aircraft like the OV-1, O-2 or OV-10 for the role of AFAC (and thus designating targets for laser-guided weaponry), but that wasn't implemented. Probably too cumbersome to bother with in the engine.



tergo90 wrote:- more big maps
- big city area and more realistic infantry garrison
- improve infantry fighting gameplay

Big Cities have existed in ALB, could be a good gimmick, but would require infantry abstraction in cities to get improved upon significantly, which has been often mentioned.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests