Spielführer wrote:That is what i mean by bending the things to your liking. Apart from the fact that the Bundeswehr never used the Blindicide, do you think the Heimatschützen would have used in 1990 those outdated weaponry? I understand your point, but this would also fit on other units. Since this does not happens, it is like a double standard, isn't it?
First, please say "hi" to BGS Blindicide
Another series here, I let the full URL so you can see the page's name "Schiessen mit Blindicide":http://www.beim-alten-bgs.de/Zu_den_Kameradenseiten/Siegfried_Dietzel/Schiessen_mit__Blindicide/schiessen_mit__blindicide.htmlOk, let have us again a look an my quote. I make it bold! As Flieger stated, BGS is not the Bundeswehr. Maybe you should read and do not rant.
The Bundeswehr never got Blindicide and since there are the Territorials with LAW, I don't see what is the problem with giving the Heimatschützen their accurate armament of PzF44. It is not like the Heimatschützen would suddenly become op.
You're the one bringing selected comparisions with France everytime, with a pretty clear bias understatement.
This is due to the fact, that (before the beta) a lot of stuff was unclear and even than not understandable.
Yep, like the Artillery as example. And the comparison is close related to the Eurokorps. Why should i compare W-Germany with another nation? So France received the Rafale, we the Iltis, France received CAESAR W-Germany the PzH M110, Germany lost Jagdkommando and gained MILAN F1/F2 and France (again a little bit better) the Milan F2A. I know you tried to justify it with the Airborne deck etc, but if you look at those examples, it is not far fetched that it looks weired.
Pretty much my point about your selected comparision.
Just got the M110 really? What about the M109G[...]3, which was the subject of torrents of rants when the closed beta started ... and is now considered OP by the very German players, on this very same thread.
And the funniest part is: but for the RoF display bug fixed (for all artillery gun) it hasn't changed since the start of the beta!
You've got Itlis? Why compare it to the Rafale when france got P4 PC & P4 MILAN, so both nations has its complement of recon/command/ATGM jeeps ... for Airborne
decks, indeed.Well, i think France received some prestige objects and in the end more toys than Germany. At the End France got more new units, especially since France also received Jeeps e.g. while good toys on Germany are missing (except PAH-2 and 2A5) while even the Stats from the Leclerc...well
German players kept complaining in ALB about air defense: Germany now has Roland 3, wheeled Raolnd 2, Stinger, Bo-105P/BSH, Gepard w/ Stinger.The reason Germany complained about air defense in ALB was mainly (that is why the Gepard buff e.g. was implemented) was that you left out the MAIN FIGHTER from the Luftwaffe, the F4. The Starfighter was no Fighter Bomber as it should be and was since the 70s and so on. A lot of mistakes were done their. That is the reason why German players kept complaining! In fact in RD the Gepards should be buffed a bit, especially the Gepard A2 since it normally should be able to fire both simultaneously (Stinger+Gun) while e.g. a Tunguska could not. Also the main improvement was the FCS and the new Ammunition as stated also often before. Also the Luftwaffe is mediocre and their would be a lot of things that could have been done for it e.g. the F4 Series. Also the Tornado ECR is not good represented with its ELS.
France got, as IRL, two Tiger variants and Germany one. On the other hand, you've got the cluster MLRS and we don't while having the exact same launcher.Ok, you got 2 Tigers, we only 1. Got it and reasonable like in RL. What about e.g. the Fuchs RASIT?`Ahh the Airborne-Deck thing.
You can turn your comparisions the way you want, I can do the same.Like bending this to your liking. Recognized it before.
Now, whatever you think or claim, we're following a logic, and we don't give a damn about favorizing one country over another.The problem is that this logic is not very transparent and followable. Thus imply kinda favorizing some countries, even if you do not. An example is the "ootf" thing. If you would really say it is ootf, it should be ootf. But on the other hand, sometimes weapons/units whatever a dropped because they are ootf because of 1 year or 2 and sometimes units are in that are ootf for 13 years and are in. That is not kinda transparent.
Spielführer wrote:Also i do not know why you always feel offended or insulted.
Hell, why should I, when you keep insulting our intelligence and imparitality in every single post?Every single post, ahh yes.
But you're right, I should not lose my temper. So, next time I see the faintest supposition of insinuation of bias or impartiality from you, I shall keep calm and just ban you once and for all for insult.If you than feel strong petit bonhomme and ban paying people just because you can't stand critic, well than do so.