High end Infantry ATGMs?
-
- Chief Warrant Officer
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Sat 6 Aug 2011 05:39
- Contact:
High end Infantry ATGMs?
could we/should we see weapons like the Kornet and FGM-148 Javelin (I'm sure there are many more to consider) as prototype infantry weapons? Kornet is certainly in the prototype time frame but Javelin is questionably so (it existed before 1995 but was not in service). Eugen has presumably decided this by now but what do you think?
Re: High end Infantry ATGMs?
They shot this down IIRC.
Sad eh.
Sad eh.
Re: High end Infantry ATGMs?
Bryan wrote:They shot this down IIRC.
Sad eh.
is it confirmed they won't be included?
- Killertomato
- More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
- Posts: 13730
- Joined: Mon 9 Jul 2012 02:46
- Contact:
Re: High end Infantry ATGMs?
naizarak wrote:
is it confirmed they won't be included?
Kornet and Javelin are definitely out.
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?
- wargamer1985
- Brigadier
- Posts: 3305
- Joined: Sat 4 May 2013 00:36
- Contact:
Re: High end Infantry ATGMs?
They would both be too OP, high AP and Acc
APPLY TO THE GLORIOUS CULT OF THE WARHAWK! LIBERATING NAZIS SINCE 1939!


- trotskygrad
- General
- Posts: 6444
- Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2012 16:09
- Location: две тысячи лет война
- Contact:
Re: High end Infantry ATGMs?
what about RPG-29 for high end infantry?
NEXT TIME I SEE A DAMN FLAMEWAR INVOLVING DARTH-LAMPSHADE, FROSTPOOKY, LONERIFLE, FADE2GRAY, TROTSKYGRAD AND/OR ANYONE INVOLVED IN A DISCUSSION BETWEEN THEM I'M GOING TO HAND OUT BANS TO ANYONE USING ANYTHING LOOKING REMOTELY LIKE AN AD-HOMINEM
-
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Sat 8 Jun 2013 23:27
- Contact:
Re: High end Infantry ATGMs?
trotskygrad wrote:what about RPG-29 for high end infantry?
I'd support that. It's a monster of an AT weapon, including a confirmed case of penetrating the armor of challenge 2 in Iraq.
If it was ingame i'd assume it would have something like 26+ AP given it could reliably take out 21st century tanks.
Before anyone says the challenger 2 drove home, remember that penetrating a modern MBT is a huge feat in it of itself, and a side shot on the turret would've probably put it out of action, like it did with that an M1A2 (i assume it was an M2 given this accident happened in 2007)
Edited for actual error: sensationalist sources were not detected in time.
-
- More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
- Posts: 10430
- Joined: Sun 6 Nov 2011 01:00
- Contact:
Re: High end Infantry ATGMs?
trotskygrad wrote:what about RPG-29 for high end infantry?
Most likely yes.

Spoiler : :
-
- Sergeant First-Class
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Thu 19 Jan 2012 03:20
- Contact:
Re: High end Infantry ATGMs?
To bad, I would have liked to have a useful atgm for the US. If the argument against is it would be over powered, then I feel like allot of US and Russian equipment will be dropped from prototypes list.
Re: High end Infantry ATGMs?
TOW 2 Bradley, who needs more? (Even if we know that the true AT weapon is the Bushmaster god).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests