New version (v61)

User avatar
SKLKNKR
Brigadier
Posts: 3137
Joined: Sat 4 Jan 2014 08:34
Contact:

Re: New version (v61)

Postby SKLKNKR » Thu 10 Apr 2014 05:45

Good news is that they are trying to do both to please both crowds.
Image
Spoiler : :
ImageImageImageImage

Thanks to F-22 for the avatar and Iris for the signature

User avatar
Bullfrog
General
Posts: 5308
Joined: Sat 11 Aug 2012 23:48
Contact:

Re: New version (v61)

Postby Bullfrog » Thu 10 Apr 2014 06:17

I like the ability to rewind, it just needs to be better polished :lol:
Does not affiliate with members who post in #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
Image

shomu1
Major-General
Posts: 3975
Joined: Mon 29 Apr 2013 08:18
Contact:

Re: New version (v61)

Postby shomu1 » Thu 10 Apr 2014 06:26

Great patch. I especially love the ability to disable evac winchester.
Image

IT IS FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

User avatar
TheD3rp
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun 19 Jan 2014 01:29
Contact:

Re: New version (v61)

Postby TheD3rp » Thu 10 Apr 2014 06:29

When will we be getting LAV and Phrog for Marines?(And don't try that argument, there is already plenty of evidence against it)

User avatar
CornProducts
Colonel
Posts: 2959
Joined: Mon 7 Apr 2014 06:48
Contact:

Re: New version (v61)

Postby CornProducts » Thu 10 Apr 2014 07:50

The people of Czechoslovavikstan thank you for making the mighty STROP 2 even mightier.
Image

User avatar
tablefootie
Master Sergeant
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun 4 Aug 2013 18:20
Contact:

Re: New version (v61)

Postby tablefootie » Thu 10 Apr 2014 09:41

Excroat3 wrote:Sometimes I hate this community. We call for something to be changed, it gets changed, and we immediately want it switched back to the old version.



Too true

Seer7
Warrant Officer
Posts: 485
Joined: Tue 4 Jun 2013 07:26
Contact:

Re: New version (v61)

Postby Seer7 » Thu 10 Apr 2014 10:21

Xeno426 wrote:Why are you comparing a recon helicopter to a combat helicopter?

I was comparing AA capabilities at the same price. Besides, the PAH-2 Tiger is a recon helicopter and gets 4 HOT 2s, rockets and 4 Stingers for 120 points vs the Mi-24Ks 110. If the Mi-24K could get 4 Iglas it would help mitigate the USSR's air assault weakness, but a cheaper AA Hind would be preferable. Something like the Hind P, except with Iglas instead of Kokons. I'll reiterate that the Hind V needs its rocket accuracy back; why they were given such terrible accuracy and a boosted ROF in the first place? Why aren't VDV available in Hinds, btw? And where is the Mi-17?

ChrisCullen Inc wrote:No they can't. Two Lynx 3s costs 220 points, which an Mi-24K does not.

I worded that poorly, I meant to highlight that they are the same price.

Graphic wrote:You know who can do them, and is almost guaranteed to come out on top? China/Red Dragons. USSR doesn't get to do everything.

Almost guaranteed? Have you played China/Red Dragons? On a good day, they're about equal to the Eurocorps in air assault, but this is beside the point. I've already argued that other coalitions don't have to rely on anyone, so why should the USSR be purposefully restricted in capabilities? And Eurocorps is not overrated, they're living up to the hype quite easily.

icehawk308 wrote:There are a few threads going around about this exact point, and not like soviets didnt mount AA missiles on non proto platforms

Spoiler : :
icehawk308 wrote:
BTR wrote:Image

Igla-V for Ka-50, Mi-28(N), Mi-24V(VP), Mi-8MTV (Mi-17MD).

Image

Image

Alternatively R-60 for Mi-24MTV and Mi-24D


viewtopic.php?f=155&t=37933&start=150

icehawk308 wrote:
Carnage1138 wrote: We need a cheap anti-helo chopper for all those godawful air assault charges.


How about a late 80s Mi-24 with R-60s instead of AT-2s?

Image
Image

Edit: thanks for bringing these up. You'd have to modify the R-60s range, of course, like you do with the AIM-9Ms on the Supercobra, but its feasible. Unfortunately they are also 3 HE and very inaccurate compared to the Igla, so they'd have to be mounted on a dedicated AA Hind, which is unlikely to happen, unless someone says otherwise. Fortunately, the R-73 could also be mounted on Hinds, so that could be an alternative to the R-60.
ImageImage
Last edited by Seer7 on Thu 10 Apr 2014 11:03, edited 2 times in total.
Image
Image

Red_King
Private
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu 10 Apr 2014 10:44
Contact:

Re: New version (v61)

Postby Red_King » Thu 10 Apr 2014 10:49

FFG-124(JPN) wrote:
INF wrote:
- Japanese Hudou-Ren number of RCL shells increased from 8 to 12


What's Hudo-Ren? It may be Hukyo-Ren?
I think no need to change name. Kyodo-Tai is not bad.


It would be neither Hudo-Ren nor Hukyo-Ren since the HU syllable doesn't exist in Japanese. I like how the names were changed from plausible names to names that just can't actually happen with the Japanese alphabet. It is the same with the change to the regular infantries name, Syoujuu-Buntai. "SYO" is not a possible syllable in the Japanese alphabet.

Out of all the changes Eugene has made, this one honestly bothers me more than anything.
Last edited by Red_King on Thu 10 Apr 2014 12:12, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
DeuZerre
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 11125
Joined: Mon 27 Feb 2012 23:17
Location: Universe, Galaxy, Solar System, Earth, Ground, Eurasian Continent, Main Landmass.
Contact:

Re: New version (v61)

Postby DeuZerre » Thu 10 Apr 2014 11:19

Maybe it's the Hadouken?
/troll
Image
Marshal honoris causa
FLX wrote:Removing the weaknesses from the divisions leads to all divisions being the same in the long run. We won't proceed like that.

naizarak
Captain
Posts: 1626
Joined: Tue 25 Dec 2012 12:53
Contact:

Re: New version (v61)

Postby naizarak » Thu 10 Apr 2014 11:40

tablefootie wrote:
Excroat3 wrote:Sometimes I hate this community. We call for something to be changed, it gets changed, and we immediately want it switched back to the old version.



Too true


people ask for new features under the assumption that current ones won't be negatively affected :roll:

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests