[Now in Red Dragon] FINLAND

Wirri
Warrant Officer
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat 3 Sep 2016 15:36
Location: PERKELE!!!
Contact:

Re: [Coming to Red Dragon] FINLAND

Postby Wirri » Mon 21 Nov 2016 20:26

Razzmann wrote:That's one ugly ass super heavy!
(The model quality itself is nice though)

How do you expect anything based on east german soviet tanks to look cool?
Altought there COULD and SHOULD be camoflage ;_;
Last edited by Wirri on Mon 21 Nov 2016 20:28, edited 1 time in total.
Spoiler : :
Razzmann wrote:
Wirri wrote:Can I finally call myself a shitposter?

You have my blessing.

User avatar
damoj
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 322
Joined: Mon 26 Sep 2016 10:07
Contact:

Re: [Coming to Red Dragon] FINLAND

Postby damoj » Mon 21 Nov 2016 20:28

>2 VYMPELS

Clepe
Corporal
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri 31 Jan 2014 01:45
Contact:

Re: [Coming to Red Dragon] FINLAND

Postby Clepe » Mon 21 Nov 2016 20:56

My initial toughts so far:
- I think ITO 90 at 90 points with the RAD tag is overpriced. Would rather have it without radar with shorter airplane range just as base crotale. Is there any technological reason for this solution, or is it just arbitrary balancing choice?
- Tank and air tabs look stronger than expected, everything that was plausible was included
- Sad that AMOS-Pasi is not included. Haven't looked closer at the available arty. It would probably not have been needed, but definitely would have been a nice flavor unit.
- nice work overall with unit choices and models

So thanks Eugen and special thanks to Tiera and Sleska for background research and keeping the hopes up for Finland since ALB. Can't wait to get my hands on the DLC.

Wirri
Warrant Officer
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat 3 Sep 2016 15:36
Location: PERKELE!!!
Contact:

Re: [Coming to Red Dragon] FINLAND

Postby Wirri » Mon 21 Nov 2016 20:57

Clepe wrote:My initial toughts so far:
- I think ITO 90 at 90 points with the RAD tag is overpriced. Would rather have it without radar with shorter airplane range just as base crotale. Is there any technological reason for this solution, or is it just arbitrary balancing choice?
- Tank and air tabs look stronger than expected, everything that was plausible was included
- Sad that AMOS-Pasi is not included. Haven't looked closer at the available arty. It would probably not have been needed, but definitely would have been a nice flavor unit.
- nice work overall with unit choices and models

So thanks Eugen and special thanks to Tiera and Sleska for background research and keeping the hopes up for Finland since ALB. Can't wait to get my hands on the DLC.

Yeah the crotale is strange, however it's upgraded from the original crotale, which is the reason. Would've been much nicer if it had been implemented with a little bit of extra helo or something.
Spoiler : :
Razzmann wrote:
Wirri wrote:Can I finally call myself a shitposter?

You have my blessing.

User avatar
Grabbed_by_the_Spets
General
Posts: 6605
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2012 11:40
Contact:

Re: [Coming to Red Dragon] FINLAND

Postby Grabbed_by_the_Spets » Mon 21 Nov 2016 21:10

Mosin equipped elite troops...

*White Death intensifies*
Image

karsayor
Sergeant Major
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed 26 Jun 2013 00:11
Contact:

Re: [Coming to Red Dragon] FINLAND

Postby karsayor » Mon 21 Nov 2016 21:17

I think that finland looks good, not OP but let's see in which coalition they will be ? Because it could make a really strong one...

The Crotale : sad, I would prefer the IR version but I think they made it because finland would lack good range anti-plane.

Generally speaking, all sisu's seems to have a too low FAV, is that normal ?

User avatar
nuke92
Lieutenant
Posts: 1119
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2016 21:51
Contact:

Re: [Coming to Red Dragon] FINLAND

Postby nuke92 » Mon 21 Nov 2016 21:21

Coalition is Poland and Yugo with CSSR allready confirmed.
Image
"Spike MR is more accurate I'll give you that but Konkurs has more range and isn't prototype" - Warchat™ July 2017
"ALB added planes, RD added ships, WG4 will add Ekranoplans" - Warchat™ August 2017

Wirri
Warrant Officer
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat 3 Sep 2016 15:36
Location: PERKELE!!!
Contact:

Re: [Coming to Red Dragon] FINLAND

Postby Wirri » Mon 21 Nov 2016 21:22

karsayor wrote:I think that finland looks good, not OP but let's see in which coalition they will be ? Because it could make a really strong one...

The Crotale : sad, I would prefer the IR version but I think they made it because finland would lack good range anti-plane.

Generally speaking, all sisu's seems to have a too low FAV, is that normal ?

Neva and BUK bad SAMs?
Spoiler : :
Razzmann wrote:
Wirri wrote:Can I finally call myself a shitposter?

You have my blessing.

User avatar
Mike
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 12407
Joined: Thu 20 Feb 2014 01:09
Location: Virginia, United States of America
Contact:

Re: [Coming to Red Dragon] FINLAND

Postby Mike » Mon 21 Nov 2016 21:23

Only two R-77s will most likely be useless.
How can Finland into 17 AP 100mm ammo?
Effectively trolled both sides with ASF F-18C (w/ ECM than US F/A-18C) and MG armed Mi-8.
Also more 70% accuracy tanks than any other nation, and first REDFOR nation with 70% accuracy.
Image
Courtesy of KattiValk

User avatar
Tiera
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2344
Joined: Tue 28 Aug 2012 00:08
Contact:

Re: [Coming to Red Dragon] FINLAND

Postby Tiera » Mon 21 Nov 2016 21:28

Mike wrote:How can Finland into 17 AP 100mm ammo?.

http://www.mecar.be/data/1156859729100mmM1000.pdf
Image

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests