[EUG]MadMat wrote:... or the myth of the urban legend of doom prophecies ...
As of now (well, a few minutes ago), a grand total of 296.924 multiplayer games have been played on Red Dragon since release. This includes ranked or friendly games, 10v10, ...
All recorded. But of these, we can only extract the alliance (BLUFOR or REDFOR), not the nations nor coalitions played.
Of course, this means that a few OPFOR (BLUFOR vs BLUFOR & REDFOR vs. REDFOR) games might disrupt a bit the stats, but they should cancel each other for the most part, and eitehr way, not have a real impact on the overall stats.
So, out of those 296.924 games, BLUFOR lead the way with 151.241 victories, which represents ... 50,93% of the games.
Which isn't that bad in our opinion, especially in the face of all the REDFOR is UP / Commonwealth is OP threads ...
Wow this is terrible statistic proving. How can you put out statistics to the community which only show one side and then claim 'there is no problem here look at my smoke screen for proof'.
To show a 51% victory ratio for BlueFor and then not give the RedFor victory ratio is an underhanded attempt to fool the community into believing that RedFor has a 49% victory.
What about all the draws?????
This could easily be reading
maybe even more, but you tell half a story to dupe the community. The question has to be asked why would you do this?